Open: Vedolizumab for Ulcerative Colitis: Treatment Outcomes from the VICTORY Consortium

Neeraj Narula(North Shore University Hospital), Farhad Peerani(University of Alberta), Joseph Meserve(North Shore University Hospital), Gursimran Kochhar(Cleveland Clinic), Khadija Chaudrey(Mayo Clinic), Justin Hartke(Indiana University Health), Prianka Chilukuri(Indiana University Health), Jenna L. Koliani‐Pace(Dartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center), Adam C. Winters(North Shore University Hospital), Leah Katta(North Shore University Hospital), Eugenia Shmidt(North Shore University Hospital), Robert Hirten(North Shore University Hospital), David M. Faleck(North Shore University Hospital), Malav P. Parikh(Cleveland Clinic), Diana Whitehead(Dartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center), Brigid S. Boland(North Shore University Hospital), Siddharth Singh(North Shore University Hospital), Sashidhar Sagi(Indiana University Health), Monika Fischer(Indiana University Health), Shannon Chang(North Shore University Hospital), Morris Barocas(North Shore University Hospital), Michelle Luo(North Shore University Hospital), Karen Lasch(North Shore University Hospital), Matthew Bohm(Indiana University Health), Dana J. Lukin(Montefiore Medical Center), Keith Sultan(North Shore University Hospital), Arun Swaminath(North Shore University Hospital), David Hudesman(North Shore University Hospital), Nitin Gupta(North Shore University Hospital), Bo Shen(Cleveland Clinic), Sunanda V. Kane(Mayo Clinic), Edward V. Loftus(Mayo Clinic), Corey A. Siegel(Dartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center), Bruce E. Sands(North Shore University Hospital), Jean‐Frédéric Colombel(North Shore University Hospital), William J. Sandborn(North Shore University Hospital), Parambir S. Dulai(North Shore University Hospital)
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
June 25, 2018
Cited by 175

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to quantify the safety and effectiveness of vedolizumab (VDZ) when used for UC, and to identify predictors of response to treatment. METHODS: Retrospective review (May 2014-December 2016) of VICTORY Consortium data. Adults with follow-up after starting VDZ for clinically active UC were included. Primary effectiveness outcomes were cumulative rates of clinical remission (resolution of all UC-related symptoms) and endoscopic remission (Mayo endoscopic sub-score 0). Key secondary effectiveness outcomes included cumulative rates of corticosteroid-free remission and deep remission (clinical remission and endoscopic remission). Cox proportional hazard analyses were used to identify independent predictors of treatment effectiveness. Non-response imputation (NRI) sensitivity analyses were performed for effectiveness outcomes. Key safety outcomes were rates of serious infection, serious adverse events, and colectomy. RESULTS: We included 321 UC patients (71% prior TNFα antagonist exposure, median follow-up 10 months). The 12-month cumulative rates of clinical remission and endoscopic remission were 51% and 41%, respectively. Corresponding rates for corticosteroid-free remission and deep remission were 37% and 30%, respectively. Using NRI, 12-month rates were 20% (n = 64/321) for clinical remission, 17% (n = 35/203) for endoscopic remission, 15% (n = 30/195) for corticosteroid-free remission, and 14% (n = 28/203) for deep remission. A majority of the patients without adequate follow-up at 12 months who were deemed non-responders using NRI had already achieved clinical remission (n = 70) or a significant clinical response (n = 36) prior to 12 months. VDZ discontinuation prior to 12 months was observed in 91 patients, for lack of response (n = 56), need for surgery (n = 29), or adverse event (n = 6). On multivariable analyses, prior exposure to a TNFα antagonist was associated with a reduced probability of achieving clinical remission (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.38-0.75) and endoscopic remission (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.29-0.88). Serious adverse events and serious infections were reported in 6% and 4% of patients, respectively. Overall cumulative rates of colectomy over 12 months were 13%, with lower rates observed in patients naive to TNFα antagonist therapy (2%) than those who had been exposed to TNFα antagonists (19%). CONCLUSION: In this large real-world cohort we observed that VDZ was well tolerated and effective in achieving key clinical outcomes.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis