Sunitinib Alone or after Nephrectomy in Metastatic Renal-Cell Carcinoma

Arnaud Méjean(Délégation Paris 5), Alain Ravaud(Délégation Paris 5), Simon Thézenas(Délégation Paris 5), Sandra Colas(Délégation Paris 5), Jean‐Baptiste Beauval(Délégation Paris 5), Karim Bensalah(Délégation Paris 5), Lionnel Geoffrois(Délégation Paris 5), Antoine Thiery-Vuillemin(Délégation Paris 5), Luc Cormier(Délégation Paris 5), Hervé Lang(Délégation Paris 5), Laurent Guy(Délégation Paris 5), Gwénaëlle Gravis(Délégation Paris 5), Frédéric Rolland(Délégation Paris 5), Claude Linassier(Université de Tours), É. Lechevallier(Délégation Paris 5), Christian Beisland(Délégation Paris 5), Michael Aitchison(Délégation Paris 5), Stéphane Oudard(Délégation Paris 5), Jean‐Jacques Patard(Délégation Paris 5), C Théodore(Délégation Paris 5), Christine Chevreau(Délégation Paris 5), Brigitte Laguerre(Délégation Paris 5), Jacques Hubert(Délégation Paris 5), Marine Gross‐Goupil(Délégation Paris 5), Jean‐Christophe Bernhard(Délégation Paris 5), Laurence Albigès(Délégation Paris 5), Marc‐Olivier Timsit(Délégation Paris 5), Thierry Lebrét(Délégation Paris 5), Bernard Escudier(Délégation Paris 5)
New England Journal of Medicine
June 3, 2018
Cited by 935

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cytoreductive nephrectomy has been the standard of care in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma for 20 years, supported by randomized trials and large, retrospective studies. However, the efficacy of targeted therapies has challenged this standard. We assessed the role of nephrectomy in patients with metastatic renal-cell carcinoma who were receiving targeted therapies. METHODS: In this phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, patients with confirmed metastatic clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma at presentation who were suitable candidates for nephrectomy to undergo nephrectomy and then receive sunitinib (standard therapy) or to receive sunitinib alone. Randomization was stratified according to prognostic risk (intermediate or poor) in the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center prognostic model. Patients received sunitinib at a dose of 50 mg daily in cycles of 28 days on and 14 days off every 6 weeks. The primary end point was overall survival. RESULTS: A total of 450 patients were enrolled from September 2009 to September 2017. At this planned interim analysis, the median follow-up was 50.9 months, with 326 deaths observed. The results in the sunitinib-alone group were noninferior to those in the nephrectomy-sunitinib group with regard to overall survival (stratified hazard ratio for death, 0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.71 to 1.10; upper boundary of the 95% confidence interval for noninferiority, ≤1.20). The median overall survival was 18.4 months in the sunitinib-alone group and 13.9 months in the nephrectomy-sunitinib group. No significant differences in response rate or progression-free survival were observed. Adverse events were as anticipated in each group. CONCLUSIONS: Sunitinib alone was not inferior to nephrectomy followed by sunitinib in patients with metastatic renal-cell carcinoma who were classified as having intermediate-risk or poor-risk disease. (Funded by Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris and others; CARMENA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00930033 .).


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis