Dupilumab Efficacy and Safety in Moderate-to-Severe Uncontrolled Asthma

Mario Castro(National Institute for Health Research), Jonathan Corren(National Institute for Health Research), Ian Pavord(National Institute for Health Research), Jorge Máspero(National Institute for Health Research), Sally E. Wenzel(National Institute for Health Research), Klaus F. Rabe(National Institute for Health Research), William W. Busse(National Institute for Health Research), Linda Ford(National Institute for Health Research), Lawrence Sher(National Institute for Health Research), J. Mark FitzGerald(National Institute for Health Research), Constance H. Katelaris(National Institute for Health Research), Yuji Tohda(National Institute for Health Research), Bingzhi Zhang(National Institute for Health Research), Heribert Staudinger(National Institute for Health Research), Gianluca Pirozzi(National Institute for Health Research), Nikhil Amin(National Institute for Health Research), Marcella Ruddy(National Institute for Health Research), Bolanle Akinlade(National Institute for Health Research), Asif Khan(National Institute for Health Research), Jingdong Chao(National Institute for Health Research), Renata Martincova(National Institute for Health Research), Neil M.H. Graham(National Institute for Health Research), Jennifer D. Hamilton(National Institute for Health Research), Brian N. Swanson(National Institute for Health Research), Neil Stahl(National Institute for Health Research), George D. Yancopoulos(National Institute for Health Research), Ariel Teper(National Institute for Health Research)
New England Journal of Medicine
May 21, 2018
Cited by 1,909Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dupilumab is a fully human anti-interleukin-4 receptor α monoclonal antibody that blocks both interleukin-4 and interleukin-13 signaling. We assessed its efficacy and safety in patients with uncontrolled asthma. METHODS: in patients with a blood eosinophil count of 300 or more per cubic millimeter. Asthma control and dupilumab safety were also assessed. RESULTS: had increased by 0.32 liters in patients assigned to the lower dose of dupilumab (difference vs. matched placebo, 0.14 liters; P<0.001); similar results were seen with the higher dose. Among patients with a blood eosinophil count of 300 or more per cubic millimeter, the annualized rate of severe asthma exacerbations was 0.37 (95% CI, 0.29 to 0.48) among those receiving lower-dose dupilumab and 1.08 (95% CI, 0.85 to 1.38) among those receiving a matched placebo (65.8% lower rate with dupilumab than with placebo; 95% CI, 52.0 to 75.6); similar results were observed with the higher dose. Blood eosinophilia occurred after the start of the intervention in 52 patients (4.1%) who received dupilumab as compared with 4 patients (0.6%) who received placebo. CONCLUSIONS: In this trial, patients who received dupilumab had significantly lower rates of severe asthma exacerbation than those who received placebo, as well as better lung function and asthma control. Greater benefits were seen in patients with higher baseline levels of eosinophils. Hypereosinophilia was observed in some patients. (Funded by Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals; LIBERTY ASTHMA QUEST ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02414854 .).


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis