MRI-Guided Thrombolysis for Stroke with Unknown Time of Onset

Götz Thomalla(Universität Hamburg), Claus Z. Simonsen(Universität Hamburg), Florent Boutitie(Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1), Grethe Andersen(Universität Hamburg), Yves Berthezène(Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1), Bastian Cheng(Universität Hamburg), Bharath Kumar Cheripelli(Universität Hamburg), Tae‐Hee Cho(Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1), Franz Fazekas(Universität Hamburg), Jens Fiehler(Universität Hamburg), Ian Ford(Universität Hamburg), Ivana Galinović(Universität Hamburg), Susanne Gellißen(Universität Hamburg), Amir Golsari(Universität Hamburg), Johannes Gregori(Universität Hamburg), Matthias Günther(Universität Hamburg), Jorge Guibernau(Universität Hamburg), Karl Georg Häusler(Universität Hamburg), Michael G. Hennerici(Universität Hamburg), André Kemmling(Universität Hamburg), Jacob Marstrand(Universität Hamburg), Boris Modrau(Universität Hamburg), Lars Neeb(Universität Hamburg), Natàlia Pérez de la Ossa(Universität Hamburg), Josep Puig(Universität Hamburg), Peter Ringleb(Universität Hamburg), Pascal Roy(Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1), Enno Scheel(Universität Hamburg), Wouter J. Schonewille(Universität Hamburg), Joaquı́n Serena(Universität Hamburg), Stefan Sunaert(Universität Hamburg), Kersten Villringer(Universität Hamburg), Anke Wouters(Universität Hamburg), Vincent Thijs(Universität Hamburg), Martin Ebinger(Universität Hamburg), Matthias Endres(Universität Hamburg), Jochen B. Fiebach(Universität Hamburg), Robin Lemmens(Universität Hamburg), Keith W. Muir(Universität Hamburg), Norbert Nighoghossian(Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1), Salvador Pedraza(Universität Hamburg), Christian Gerloff(Universität Hamburg)
New England Journal of Medicine
May 16, 2018
Cited by 1,269Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Under current guidelines, intravenous thrombolysis is used to treat acute stroke only if it can be ascertained that the time since the onset of symptoms was less than 4.5 hours. We sought to determine whether patients with stroke with an unknown time of onset and features suggesting recent cerebral infarction on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) would benefit from thrombolysis with the use of intravenous alteplase. METHODS: In a multicenter trial, we randomly assigned patients who had an unknown time of onset of stroke to receive either intravenous alteplase or placebo. All the patients had an ischemic lesion that was visible on MRI diffusion-weighted imaging but no parenchymal hyperintensity on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), which indicated that the stroke had occurred approximately within the previous 4.5 hours. We excluded patients for whom thrombectomy was planned. The primary end point was favorable outcome, as defined by a score of 0 or 1 on the modified Rankin scale of neurologic disability (which ranges from 0 [no symptoms] to 6 [death]) at 90 days. A secondary outcome was the likelihood that alteplase would lead to lower ordinal scores on the modified Rankin scale than would placebo (shift analysis). RESULTS: The trial was stopped early owing to cessation of funding after the enrollment of 503 of an anticipated 800 patients. Of these patients, 254 were randomly assigned to receive alteplase and 249 to receive placebo. A favorable outcome at 90 days was reported in 131 of 246 patients (53.3%) in the alteplase group and in 102 of 244 patients (41.8%) in the placebo group (adjusted odds ratio, 1.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09 to 2.36; P=0.02). The median score on the modified Rankin scale at 90 days was 1 in the alteplase group and 2 in the placebo group (adjusted common odds ratio, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.17 to 2.23; P=0.003). There were 10 deaths (4.1%) in the alteplase group and 3 (1.2%) in the placebo group (odds ratio, 3.38; 95% CI, 0.92 to 12.52; P=0.07). The rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was 2.0% in the alteplase group and 0.4% in the placebo group (odds ratio, 4.95; 95% CI, 0.57 to 42.87; P=0.15). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute stroke with an unknown time of onset, intravenous alteplase guided by a mismatch between diffusion-weighted imaging and FLAIR in the region of ischemia resulted in a significantly better functional outcome and numerically more intracranial hemorrhages than placebo at 90 days. (Funded by the European Union Seventh Framework Program; WAKE-UP ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01525290; and EudraCT number, 2011-005906-32 .).


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis