Clinical use of intracoronary imaging. Part 1: guidance and optimization of coronary interventions. An expert consensus document of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions

Lorenz Räber(University Hospital of Bern), Gary S. Mintz(Cardiovascular Research Foundation), Konstantinos C. Koskinas(University Hospital of Bern), Tom Johnson, Niels Ramsing Holm(Aarhus University Hospital), Yoshinubo Onuma(Erasmus MC), Maria Radu(Copenhagen University Hospital), Michael Joner(German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Bo Yu(Harbin Medical University), Haibo Jia(Harbin Medical University), Nicolas Méneveau(Université de Bourgogne), José M. de la Torre Hernández(Instituto de Investigación Marqués de Valdecilla), Javier Escaned(Hospital Clínico San Carlos), Jonathan Hill(King's College Hospital), Francesco Prati(Institute for Scientific Interchange), Antonio Colombo(San Raffaele University of Rome), Carlo Di Mario(Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi), Evelyn Regar(University of Zurich), Davide Capodanno(University of Catania), William Wijns(Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway), Robert A. Byrne(Deutsches Herzzentrum München), Giulio Guagliumi(Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII), ESC Scientific Document Group(Hospital Universitario de La Princesa), Fernándo Alfonso(The University of Sydney), Ravinay Bhindi(The University of Sydney), Ziad A. Ali(Columbia University Irving Medical Center), Rickey E. Carter(Mayo Clinic in Florida)
European Heart Journal
May 16, 2018
Cited by 720Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

This Consensus Document is the first of two reports summarizing the views of an expert panel organized by the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) on the clinical use of intracoronary imaging including intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT). The first document appraises the role of intracoronary imaging to guide percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) in clinical practice. Current evidence regarding the impact of intracoronary imaging guidance on cardiovascular outcomes is summarized, and patients or lesions most likely to derive clinical benefit from an imaging-guided intervention are identified. The relevance of the use of IVUS or OCT prior to PCI for optimizing stent sizing (stent length and diameter) and planning the procedural strategy is discussed. Regarding post-implantation imaging, the consensus group recommends key parameters that characterize an optimal PCI result and provides cut-offs to guide corrective measures and optimize the stenting result. Moreover, routine performance of intracoronary imaging in patients with stent failure (restenosis or stent thrombosis) is recommended. Finally, strengths and limitations of IVUS and OCT for guiding PCI and assessing stent failures and areas that warrant further research are critically discussed.


Related Papers