Interaction of healthcare staff’s attitude with barriers to physical activity in hemodialysis patients: A quantitative assessment

Giuseppe Regolisti, Umberto Maggiore(Ospedale di Parma), Alice Sabatino, Ilaria Gandolfini(Ospedale di Parma), Sarah Pioli(Società Italiana di Nefrologia), Claudia Torino, Filippo Aucella(Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza), Adamasco Cupisti(University of Pisa), Valentina Pistolesi, Alessandro Capitanini(Società Italiana di Nefrologia), Giorgia Apollonia Caloro(Società Italiana di Nefrologia), Mariacristina Gregorini(Società Italiana di Nefrologia), Yuri Battaglia(Società Italiana di Nefrologia), Marcora Mandreoli(Società Italiana di Nefrologia), Lucia Dani(Società Italiana di Nefrologia), Giovanni Mosconi(Società Italiana di Nefrologia), Vincenzo Bellizzi(Società Italiana di Nefrologia), Biagio Di Iorio(Azienda Ospedaliera S.Giuseppe Moscati), Paolo Conti, Enrico Fiaccadori(Ospedale di Parma), on behalf of the Gruppo di Studio “Esercizio fisico nel paziente con insufficienza renale cronica” of the Società Italiana di Nefrologia
PLoS ONE
April 27, 2018
Cited by 63Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: In hemodialysis patients, sedentarism is a potentially modifiable mortality risk factor. We explored whether healthcare staff's attitude towards exercise interacts with patient-perceived barriers in modifying the level of physical activity in this population. METHODS: In this prospective, cross-sectional, multicenter study we recruited 608 adult patients and 330 members of the healthcare staff in 16 hemodialysis units in Italy. We assessed patient-perceived barriers to, and healthcare staff's attitude towards, exercise by specific questionnaires. We fitted multilevel linear models to analyze the relationships of either barriers or staff's attitude, and their interaction, with a measure of patient self-reported physical activity (the Human Activity Profile-Adjusted Activity Score [HAP-AAS]), adjusting for multiple confounders. We also employed latent class analysis to dichotomize patients into those endorsing or not endorsing barriers. RESULTS: Most barriers were negatively associated with the HAP-AAS (adjusted change attributable to a given barrier ranging between -5.1 ["Feeling too old", 95% Confidence Interval: -9.4 to -0.8] and -15.6 ["Ulcers on legs and feet", 95%CI: -24.8 to -6.5]. We found a significant interaction between staff's attitude and barriers (adjusted P values ranging between 0.03 ["I do not believe that it is physician's or nurse's role providing advice on exercise to patients on dialysis"] and 0.001 ["I do not often ask patients about exercise"]). A beneficial effect of a proactive staff's attitude was evident only in patients not endorsing barriers. CONCLUSIONS: Barriers and non-proactive staff's attitude reduce physical activity in hemodialysis patients. Patients not endorsing barriers benefit the most from a proactive staff's attitude.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis