Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonists During Chemotherapy for Preservation of Ovarian Function and Fertility in Premenopausal Patients With Early Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Individual Patient–Level Data

Matteo Lambertini(Institut Jules Bordet), Halle C. F. Moore(Institut Jules Bordet), Robert Leonard(Institut Jules Bordet), Sibylle Loibl(Institut Jules Bordet), Pamela N. Münster(Institut Jules Bordet), Marco Bruzzone(Institut Jules Bordet), Luca Boni(Institut Jules Bordet), Joseph M. Unger(Institut Jules Bordet), Richard A. Anderson(Institut Jules Bordet), Keyur Mehta(Institut Jules Bordet), Susan Minton(Institut Jules Bordet), Francesca Poggio(Institut Jules Bordet), Kathy S. Albain(Institut Jules Bordet), Douglas Adamson(Institut Jules Bordet), Bernd Gerber(Institut Jules Bordet), Amy Cripps(Institut Jules Bordet), Gianfilippo Bertelli(Institut Jules Bordet), Sabine Seiler(Institut Jules Bordet), Marcello Ceppi(Institut Jules Bordet), Ann H. Partridge(Institut Jules Bordet), Lucia Del Mastro(Institut Jules Bordet)
Journal of Clinical Oncology
May 2, 2018
Cited by 378Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Purpose The role of temporary ovarian suppression with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) during chemotherapy as a strategy to preserve ovarian function and fertility in premenopausal women remains controversial. This systematic review and meta-analysis using individual patient-level data was conducted to better assess the efficacy and safety of this strategy in patients with early breast cancer. Methods The trials in which premenopausal women with early breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy alone or with concurrent GnRHa were eligible for inclusion. Primary end points were premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) rate and post-treatment pregnancy rate. Disease-free survival and overall survival were secondary end points. Because each study represents a cluster, statistical analyses were performed using a random effects model. Results A total of 873 patients from five trials were included. POI rate was 14.1% in the GnRHa group and 30.9% in the control group (adjusted odds ratio, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.26 to 0.57; P < .001). A total of 37 (10.3%) patients had at least one post-treatment pregnancy in the GnRHa group and 20 (5.5%) in the control group (incidence rate ratio, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.06 to 3.15; P = .030). No significant differences in disease-free survival (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.42; P = .999) and overall survival (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.42 to 1.06; P = .083) were observed between groups. Conclusion Our findings provide evidence for the efficacy and safety of temporary ovarian suppression with GnRHa during chemotherapy as an available option to reduce the likelihood of chemotherapy-induced POI and potentially improve future fertility in premenopausal patients with early breast cancer.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis