Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab in Lung Cancer with a High Tumor Mutational Burden

Matthew D. Hellmann(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Tudor–Eliade Ciuleanu(Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy), Adam Płużański(Centrum Onkologii), Jong Seok Lee(Seoul National University Bundang Hospital), Gregory A. Otterson(Centrum Onkologii), Clarisse Audigier-Valette(Centrum Onkologii), Elisa Minenza(Ospedale Santa Maria), Helena Linardou(Centrum Onkologii), Sjaak A. Burgers(The Netherlands Cancer Institute), Pamela Salman(Centrum Onkologii), Hossein Borghaei(Fox Chase Cancer Center), Suresh S. Ramalingam(Emory University), Julie R. Brahmer(Centrum Onkologii), Martin Reck(German Center for Lung Research), Kenneth J. O’Byrne(Princess Alexandra Hospital), William J. Geese(Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States)), George Green(Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States)), Chang Han(Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States)), Joseph D. Szustakowski(Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States)), Prabhu Bhagavatheeswaran(Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States)), Diane Healey(Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States)), Yali Fu(Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States)), Faith E. Nathan(Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States)), Luis Paz‐Ares(Hospital Universitario 12 De Octubre)
New England Journal of Medicine
April 16, 2018
Cited by 3,131Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nivolumab plus ipilimumab showed promising efficacy for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in a phase 1 trial, and tumor mutational burden has emerged as a potential biomarker of benefit. In this part of an open-label, multipart, phase 3 trial, we examined progression-free survival with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus chemotherapy among patients with a high tumor mutational burden (≥10 mutations per megabase). METHODS: We enrolled patients with stage IV or recurrent NSCLC that was not previously treated with chemotherapy. Those with a level of tumor programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression of at least 1% were randomly assigned, in a 1:1:1 ratio, to receive nivolumab plus ipilimumab, nivolumab monotherapy, or chemotherapy; those with a tumor PD-L1 expression level of less than 1% were randomly assigned, in a 1:1:1 ratio, to receive nivolumab plus ipilimumab, nivolumab plus chemotherapy, or chemotherapy. Tumor mutational burden was determined by the FoundationOne CDx assay. RESULTS: Progression-free survival among patients with a high tumor mutational burden was significantly longer with nivolumab plus ipilimumab than with chemotherapy. The 1-year progression-free survival rate was 42.6% with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus 13.2% with chemotherapy, and the median progression-free survival was 7.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.5 to 13.2) versus 5.5 months (95% CI, 4.4 to 5.8) (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.58; 97.5% CI, 0.41 to 0.81; P<0.001). The objective response rate was 45.3% with nivolumab plus ipilimumab and 26.9% with chemotherapy. The benefit of nivolumab plus ipilimumab over chemotherapy was broadly consistent within subgroups, including patients with a PD-L1 expression level of at least 1% and those with a level of less than 1%. The rate of grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events was 31.2% with nivolumab plus ipilimumab and 36.1% with chemotherapy. ical; CheckMate 227 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02477826 .). CONCLUSIONS: Progression-free survival was significantly longer with first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab than with chemotherapy among patients with NSCLC and a high tumor mutational burden, irrespective of PD-L1 expression level. The results validate the benefit of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in NSCLC and the role of tumor mutational burden as a biomarker for patient selection. (Funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb and Ono Pharmaceut


Related Papers