European Society of Cardiology, acute cardiovascular care association, SCAD study group: a position paper on spontaneous coronary artery dissection

David Adlam(University of Leicester), Fernándo Alfonso(Hospital Universitario de La Princesa), Angela H.E.M. Maas(Radboud University Nijmegen), Christiaan Vrints(University of Antwerp), Abtehale Al-Hussaini(University of Leicester), Héctor Bueno(Spanish National Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Piera Capranzano(University of Catania), Sofie Gevaert(Ghent University Hospital), Stephen P. Hoole(Papworth Hospital), Tom Johnson(University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust), Corrado Lettieri(Azienda Ospedaliera Carlo Poma), Micha T. Maeder(Kantonsspital St. Gallen), Pascal Motreff(Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique), Peter Ong(Robert Bosch Hospital), Alexandre Persu(Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc), Hans Rickli(Kantonsspital St. Gallen), François Schiele(Université de Bourgogne), Mary N. Sheppard(St George's, University of London), Eva Swahn(Linköping University)
European Heart Journal
February 7, 2018
Cited by 652Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) has long been recognized as a cause of acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Initially considered very rare and associated primarily with pregnancy and the peripartum period, the use of higher sensitivity Troponin assays and early angiography in ACS, coupled with greater awareness of the condition, has led to increased diagnosis, and it is now understood that SCAD represents a significant cause of ACS in predominantly young to middleaged women, with most cases occurring outside the context of recent pregnancy.1,2 Although there are no randomized controlled trials in SCAD, knowledge has further advanced in the last 5-years as a result of an international research effort primarily focused on building and studying national SCAD registries.3–19 These studies have demonstrated, not only that SCAD is a distinct pathophysiological entity, but that there are key differences in management and outcomes compared to ACS of atherosclerotic aetiology. This position paper aims to set-out current knowledge on SCAD for the benefit of practicing clinicians caring for patients with this condition. It presents the consensus on contemporary management and areas of controversy and uncertainty, which remain a focus of ongoing research. The information is provided to support clinical care providers but is not intended to replace individualized decision-making by clinicians and other health care professionals. [...]


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis