MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy for Prostate-Cancer Diagnosis

Veeru Kasivisvanathan(University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust), Antti Rannikko(University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust), Marcelo Borghi(University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust), Valeria Panebianco(University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust), Lance A. Mynderse(University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust), Markku H. Vaarala(University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust), Alberto Briganti(University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust), Lars Budäus(University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust), Giles Hellawell(University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust), Richard Hindley(University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust), Monique J. Roobol(University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust), Scott E. Eggener(University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust), Maneesh Ghei(University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust), Arnauld Villers(University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust), Franck Bladou(University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust), Geert Villeirs(University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust), Jaspal Virdi(University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust), Silvan Boxler(University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust), G. Robert(University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust), Paras B. Singh(University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust), Wulphert Venderink(University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust), Boris Hadaschik(University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust), A. Ruffion(University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust), Jim C. Hu(NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital), Daniel Margolis(NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital), Sébastien Crouzet(University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust), Laurence Klotz(Sunnybrook Health Science Centre), Samir S. Taneja(University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust), Peter A. Pinto(National Institutes of Health), Inderbir S. Gill(University of Southern California), Clare Allen(University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust), Francesco Giganti(University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust), Alex Freeman(University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust), Stephen Morris(University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust), Shonit Punwani(University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust), Norman Williams(University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust), Chris Brew‐Graves(University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust), Jonathan J Deeks(University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust), Yemisi Takwoingi(University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust), Mark Emberton(University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust), Caroline M. Moore(University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust)
New England Journal of Medicine
March 19, 2018
Cited by 2,981Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), with or without targeted biopsy, is an alternative to standard transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsy for prostate-cancer detection in men with a raised prostate-specific antigen level who have not undergone biopsy. However, comparative evidence is limited. METHODS: In a multicenter, randomized, noninferiority trial, we assigned men with a clinical suspicion of prostate cancer who had not undergone biopsy previously to undergo MRI, with or without targeted biopsy, or standard transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsy. Men in the MRI-targeted biopsy group underwent a targeted biopsy (without standard biopsy cores) if the MRI was suggestive of prostate cancer; men whose MRI results were not suggestive of prostate cancer were not offered biopsy. Standard biopsy was a 10-to-12-core, transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsy. The primary outcome was the proportion of men who received a diagnosis of clinically significant cancer. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of men who received a diagnosis of clinically insignificant cancer. RESULTS: A total of 500 men underwent randomization. In the MRI-targeted biopsy group, 71 of 252 men (28%) had MRI results that were not suggestive of prostate cancer, so they did not undergo biopsy. Clinically significant cancer was detected in 95 men (38%) in the MRI-targeted biopsy group, as compared with 64 of 248 (26%) in the standard-biopsy group (adjusted difference, 12 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4 to 20; P=0.005). MRI, with or without targeted biopsy, was noninferior to standard biopsy, and the 95% confidence interval indicated the superiority of this strategy over standard biopsy. Fewer men in the MRI-targeted biopsy group than in the standard-biopsy group received a diagnosis of clinically insignificant cancer (adjusted difference, -13 percentage points; 95% CI, -19 to -7; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The use of risk assessment with MRI before biopsy and MRI-targeted biopsy was superior to standard transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsy in men at clinical risk for prostate cancer who had not undergone biopsy previously. (Funded by the National Institute for Health Research and the European Association of Urology Research Foundation; PRECISION ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02380027 .).


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis