Effectiveness of Practices to Support Appropriate Laboratory Test Utilization

Matthew L. Rubinstein(Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), Robert Hirsch(Carter Center), Kakali Bandyopadhyay(Deloitte (United States)), Bereneice M. Madison(Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), Thomas H. Taylor(Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), Anne Ranne(Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), Millie L. Linville(Deloitte (United States)), Keri Donaldson(Pennsylvania State University), Felicitas Lacbawan(Quest Diagnostics (United States)), Nancy E. Cornish(Centers for Disease Control and Prevention)
American Journal of Clinical Pathology
October 18, 2017
Cited by 86Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of practices used to support appropriate clinical laboratory test utilization. METHODS: This review followed the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Laboratory Medicine Best Practices A6 cycle method. Eligible studies assessed one of the following practices for effect on outcomes relating to over- or underutilization: computerized provider order entry (CPOE), clinical decision support systems/tools (CDSS/CDST), education, feedback, test review, reflex testing, laboratory test utilization (LTU) teams, and any combination of these practices. Eligible outcomes included intermediate, systems outcomes (eg, number of tests ordered/performed and cost of tests), as well as patient-related outcomes (eg, length of hospital stay, readmission rates, morbidity, and mortality). RESULTS: Eighty-three studies met inclusion criteria. Fifty-one of these studies could be meta-analyzed. Strength of evidence ratings for each practice ranged from high to insufficient. CONCLUSION: Practice recommendations are made for CPOE (specifically, modifications to existing CPOE), reflex testing, and combined practices. No recommendation for or against could be made for CDSS/CDST, education, feedback, test review, and LTU. Findings from this review serve to inform guidance for future studies.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis