Venetoclax–Rituximab in Relapsed or Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

John F. Seymour(The Royal Melbourne Hospital), Thomas J. Kipps(University of California San Diego), Barbara Eichhorst(University Hospital Cologne), Peter Hillmen(St James's University Hospital), James D’Rozario(Australian National University), Sarit Assouline(Jewish General Hospital), Carolyn Owen(University of Calgary), John F. Gerecitano(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Tadeusz Robak(Copernicus Memorial Hospital), Javier de la Serna(Hospital Universitario 12 De Octubre), Ulrich Jaeger(University Hospital Cologne), Guillaume Cartron(Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier), Marco Montillo(Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda), Rod Humerickhouse(AbbVie (United States)), Elizabeth A. Punnoose(University Hospital Cologne), Yan Li(University Hospital Cologne), Michelle Boyer(Roche (United Kingdom)), Kathryn Humphrey(Roche (United Kingdom)), Mehrdad Mobasher(University Hospital Cologne), Arnon P. Kater(Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam)
New England Journal of Medicine
March 21, 2018
Cited by 901Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Venetoclax inhibits BCL2, an antiapoptotic protein that is pathologically overexpressed and that is central to the survival of chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells. We evaluated the efficacy of venetoclax in combination with rituximab in patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia. METHODS: In this randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned 389 patients to receive venetoclax for up to 2 years (from day 1 of cycle 1) plus rituximab for the first 6 months (venetoclax-rituximab group) or bendamustine plus rituximab for 6 months (bendamustine-rituximab group). The trial design did not include crossover to venetoclax plus rituximab for patients in the bendamustine-rituximab group in whom progression occurred. The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival. RESULTS: After a median follow-up period of 23.8 months, the rate of investigator-assessed progression-free survival was significantly higher in the venetoclax-rituximab group (32 events of progression or death in 194 patients) than in the bendamustine-rituximab group (114 events in 195 patients); the 2-year rates of progression-free survival were 84.9% and 36.3%, respectively (hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.11 to 0.25; P<0.001 by the stratified log-rank test). The benefit was maintained across all clinical and biologic subgroups, including the subgroup of patients with chromosome 17p deletion; the 2-year rate of progression-free survival among patients with chromosome 17p deletion was 81.5% in the venetoclax-rituximab group versus 27.8% in the bendamustine-rituximab group (hazard ratio, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.29), and the 2-year rate among those without chromosome 17p deletion was 85.9% versus 41.0% (hazard ratio, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.12 to 0.32). The benefit of venetoclax plus rituximab over bendamustine plus rituximab was confirmed by an independent review committee assessment of progression-free survival and other secondary efficacy end points. The rate of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was higher in the venetoclax-rituximab group than in the bendamustine-rituximab group, but the rates of grade 3 or 4 febrile neutropenia and infections or infestations were lower with venetoclax than with bendamustine. The rate of grade 3 or 4 tumor lysis syndrome in the venetoclax-rituximab group was 3.1% (6 of 194 patients). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia, venetoclax plus rituximab resulted in significantly higher rates of progression-free survival than bendamustine plus rituximab. (Funded by Genentech and AbbVie; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02005471 .).


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis