A comparison of five methods of measuring mammographic density: a case-control study
Susan Astley(University of Manchester), D. Gareth Evans(Manchester Academic Health Science Centre), Jack Cuzick(Queen Mary University of London), Ursula Beetles(Manchester Academic Health Science Centre), Mary Wilson(St Mary's Hospital), Elaine F. Harkness(Manchester Academic Health Science Centre), Valerie Reece(Breast Cancer Care), Ruth Warren(University of Cambridge), Jamie C. Sergeant(Manchester Academic Health Science Centre), Adam R. Brentnall(Queen Mary University of London), Yit Yoong Lim(Wythenshawe Hospital), Soujanya Gadde(Breast Cancer Care), Sara Bundred(Breast Cancer Care), Anil Jain(Manchester Academic Health Science Centre), Nicola Barr(Manchester Academic Health Science Centre), Paula Stavrinos(Breast Cancer Research Foundation), Jane Warwick(St Mary's Hospital)
Cited by 137
Related Papers
Prediction models for diagnosis and prognosis of covid-19: systematic review and critical appraisal
|BMJ|2020|3.3k
De-escalating and escalating treatments for early-stage breast cancer: the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus Conference on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2017
|Annals of Oncology|2017|1.3k
Polygenic Risk Scores for Prediction of Breast Cancer and Breast Cancer Subtypes
|The American Journal of Human Genetics|2018|1.2k
Overview of the European and North American studies on HPV testing in primary cervical cancer screening
|International Journal of Cancer|2006|1.1k