The EMBRACE II study: The outcome and prospect of two decades of evolution within the GEC-ESTRO GYN working group and the EMBRACE studies

Richard Pötter(Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna), Kari Tanderup(Aarhus University Hospital), Christian Kirisits(Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna), Astrid de Leeuw(University Medical Center Utrecht), Kathrin Kirchheiner(Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna), Remi A. Nout(Leiden University Medical Center), Li Tee Tan(National Health Service), Christine Haie-Méder(Institut Gustave Roussy), Umesh Mahantshetty(Tata Memorial Hospital), Barbara Šegedin(Institute of Oncology Ljubljana), Peter Hoskin(Mount Vernon Cancer Centre), Kjersti Bruheim(Oslo University Hospital), Bhavana Rai(Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research), Fleur Huang(University of Alberta), Erik Van Limbergen, Max Schmid(Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna), N. Nesvacil(Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna), Alina Sturdza(Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna), Lars Fokdal(Aarhus University Hospital), Nina Boje Kibsgaard Jensen(Aarhus University Hospital), Dietmar Georg(Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna), Marianne S. Assenholt(Aarhus University Hospital), Yvette Seppenwoolde(Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna), C. Nomden(University Medical Center Utrecht), Israël Fortin(Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna), Supriya Chopra(Tata Memorial Hospital), Uulke A. van der Heide(The Netherlands Cancer Institute), Tamara Rumpold(Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna), Jacob Christian Lindegaard(Aarhus University Hospital), Ina M. Jürgenliemk‐Schulz(University Medical Center Utrecht)
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
January 11, 2018
Cited by 927Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

The publication of the GEC-ESTRO recommendations one decade ago was a significant step forward for reaching international consensus on adaptive target definition and dose reporting in image guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) in locally advanced cervical cancer. Since then, IGABT has been spreading, particularly in Europe, North America and Asia, and the guidelines have proved their broad acceptance and applicability in clinical practice. However, a unified approach to volume contouring and reporting does not imply a unified administration of treatment, and currently both external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and IGABT are delivered using a large variety of techniques and prescription/fractionation schedules. With IGABT, local control is excellent in limited and well-responding tumours. The major challenges are currently loco-regional control in advanced tumours, treatment-related morbidity, and distant metastatic disease. Emerging evidence from the RetroEMBRACE and EMBRACE I studies has demonstrated that clinical outcome is related to dose prescription and technique. The next logical step is to demonstrate excellent clinical outcome with the most advanced EBRT and brachytherapy techniques based on an evidence-based prospective dose and volume prescription protocol. The EMBRACE II study is an interventional and observational multicentre study which aims to benchmark a high level of local, nodal and systemic control while limiting morbidity, using state of the art treatment including an advanced target volume selection and contouring protocol for EBRT and brachytherapy, a multi-parametric brachytherapy dose prescription protocol (clinical validation of dose constraints), and use of advanced EBRT (IMRT and IGRT) and brachytherapy (IC/IS) techniques (clinical validation). The study also incorporates translational research including imaging and tissue biomarkers.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis