HALO 202: Randomized Phase II Study of PEGPH20 Plus Nab-Paclitaxel/Gemcitabine Versus Nab-Paclitaxel/Gemcitabine in Patients With Untreated, Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Sunil R. Hingorani(Cape Town HVTN Immunology Laboratory / Hutchinson Centre Research Institute of South Africa), Lei Zheng(Cape Town HVTN Immunology Laboratory / Hutchinson Centre Research Institute of South Africa), Andrea J. Bullock(Cape Town HVTN Immunology Laboratory / Hutchinson Centre Research Institute of South Africa), Tara Elisabeth Seery(Cape Town HVTN Immunology Laboratory / Hutchinson Centre Research Institute of South Africa), William Proctor Harris(Cape Town HVTN Immunology Laboratory / Hutchinson Centre Research Institute of South Africa), Darren Sigal(Cape Town HVTN Immunology Laboratory / Hutchinson Centre Research Institute of South Africa), Fadi Braiteh(Cape Town HVTN Immunology Laboratory / Hutchinson Centre Research Institute of South Africa), Paul S. Ritch(Cape Town HVTN Immunology Laboratory / Hutchinson Centre Research Institute of South Africa), Mark M. Zalupski(Cape Town HVTN Immunology Laboratory / Hutchinson Centre Research Institute of South Africa), Nathan Bahary(Cape Town HVTN Immunology Laboratory / Hutchinson Centre Research Institute of South Africa), Paul E. Oberstein(Cape Town HVTN Immunology Laboratory / Hutchinson Centre Research Institute of South Africa), Andrea Wang‐Gillam(Cape Town HVTN Immunology Laboratory / Hutchinson Centre Research Institute of South Africa), Wilson Wu(Cape Town HVTN Immunology Laboratory / Hutchinson Centre Research Institute of South Africa), Dimitrios Chondros(Cape Town HVTN Immunology Laboratory / Hutchinson Centre Research Institute of South Africa), Ping Jiang(Cape Town HVTN Immunology Laboratory / Hutchinson Centre Research Institute of South Africa), Sihem Khelifa(Cape Town HVTN Immunology Laboratory / Hutchinson Centre Research Institute of South Africa), Jie Pu(Cape Town HVTN Immunology Laboratory / Hutchinson Centre Research Institute of South Africa), Carrie Aldrich(Cape Town HVTN Immunology Laboratory / Hutchinson Centre Research Institute of South Africa), Andrew Hendifar(Cape Town HVTN Immunology Laboratory / Hutchinson Centre Research Institute of South Africa)
Journal of Clinical Oncology
December 12, 2017
Cited by 483

Abstract

Purpose Metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is characterized by excessive hyaluronan (HA) accumulation in the tumor microenvironment, elevating interstitial pressure and impairing perfusion. Preclinical studies demonstrated pegvorhyaluronidase alfa (PEGPH20) degrades HA, thereby increasing drug delivery. Patients and Methods Patients with previously untreated metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma were randomly assigned to treatment with PEGPH20 plus nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine (PAG) or nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine (AG). Tumor HA levels were measured retrospectively using a novel affinity histochemistry assay. Primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS; overall) and thromboembolic (TE) event rate. Secondary end points included overall survival, PFS by HA level, and objective response rate. An early imbalance in TE events in the PAG arm led to a clinical hold; thereafter, patients with TE events were excluded and enoxaparin prophylaxis was initiated. Results A total of 279 patients were randomly assigned; 246 had HA data; 231 were evaluable for efficacy; 84 (34%) had HA-high tumors (ie, extracellular matrix HA staining ≥ 50% of tumor surface at any intensity). PFS was significantly improved with PAG treatment overall (hazard ratio [HR], 0.73; 95% CI, 0.53 to 1.00; P = .049) and for patients with HA-high tumors (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.26 to 1.00; P = .048). In patients with HA-high tumors (PAG v AG), the objective response rate was 45% versus 31%, and median overall survival was 11.5 versus 8.5 months (HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.57 to 1.61). The most common treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events with significant differences between arms (PAG v AG) included muscle spasms (13% v 1%), neutropenia (29% v 18%), and myalgia (5% v 0%). TE events were comparable after enoxaparin initiation (14% PAG v 10% AG). Conclusion This study met its primary end points of PFS and TE event rate. The largest improvement in PFS was observed in patients with HA-high tumors who received PAG. A similar TE event rate was observed between the treatment groups in stage 2 of the trial.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis