Comparison of Neoadjuvant Nab-Paclitaxel+Carboplatin vs Nab-Paclitaxel+Gemcitabine in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Randomized WSG-ADAPT-TN Trial Results

Oleg Gluz(Deutsches Archäologisches Institut, Zentrale), Ulrike Nitz(Deutsches Archäologisches Institut, Zentrale), Cornelia Liedtke, Matthias Christgen(Medizinische Hochschule Hannover), Eva‐Maria Grischke(University Hospital and Clinics), Helmut Forstbauer(Atos Medical), Michael Braun(Breast Center), Mathias Warm(Breast Center), John Hackmann(Breast Center), Christoph Uleer, Bahriye Aktas(University Hospital Leipzig), Claudia Schumacher(St. Elisabeth Hospital), Nikola Bangemann(Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin), Christoph Lindner(Agaplesion Frankfurter Diakonie Kliniken), Sherko Küemmel(Breast Center), Michael Clemens(Klinikum Mutterhaus der Borromäerinnen), Jochem Potenberg(Waldkrankenhaus Protestant Hospital), Peter Staib(St.-Antonius-Hospital Gronau), A. Kohls, Raquel von Schumann(Breast Center), Ronald Kates(Deutsches Archäologisches Institut, Zentrale), Ronald Kates(Deutsches Archäologisches Institut, Zentrale), Johannes Schumacher, Rachel Wuerstlein(Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München), Hans Kreipe(Medizinische Hochschule Hannover), Nadia Harbeck(Deutsches Archäologisches Institut, Zentrale)
JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
November 13, 2017
Cited by 132Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Background: Pathological complete response (pCR) is associated with improved prognosis in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). The optimal chemotherapy regimen is unclear. Weekly nab-paclitaxel vs conventional paclitaxel or addition of carboplatin to anthracycline-taxane results in higher pCR rates with uncertain survival impact. We evaluated carboplatin vs gemcitabine with a nab-paclitaxel backbone as a short 12-week A-free regimen with a focus on early response. Methods: Patients with TNBC (estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor < 1%, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, cT1c-cT4c, cN0/+) were randomly assigned to A: nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2/gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 d1,8 three times weekly (q3w); vs B: nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2/carboplatin AUC2 day 1,8 q3w. The trial was powered for a pCR (ypT0/is ypN0) comparison by therapy arm and early response (defined as Ki-67 decrease >30% or < 500 invasive tumor cells in the three-week serial biopsy). All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: A total of 336 patients were enrolled (48 centers, arms A/B: n = 182/154). The median age was 50 years. At baseline (A vs B), 62.6% and 62.9% had cT2-4c tumors; 86.8% and 90.9% completed therapy per protocol, respectively. pCR favored arm B (28.7%, 95% CI = 0.22 to 0.36, vs 45.9%, 95% CI = 0.38 to 0.54; 95% CI(dBA) = 6.2% to 27.9%, P = .002) and was lower in nonresponders than in early responders (19.5% vs 44.4%, P < .001) or in patients with unclassifiable early response (50.0%). The nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine was associated with more frequent dose reductions (20.6% vs 11.9%, P = .04), treatment-related serious adverse events (11.1% vs 5.3%, P = .07), grade 3-4 infections (7.2% vs 2.6%, P = .07), and grade 3-4 ALAT elevations (11.7 vs 3.3%, P = .01). Conclusions: This first large randomized trial suggests high efficacy and excellent tolerability of a neoadjuvant nab-paclitaxel/carboplatin regimen, superior to nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine in TNBC. De-escalation of further chemotherapy in patients with early pCR after a short anthracycline-free regimen is a promising field of future research. Early necrotic morphological changes and/or proliferation decrease after the first therapy cycle seem to be associated with subsequent pCR.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis