Recent Developments in Mendelian Randomization Studies

Jie Zheng(University of Bristol), Denis Baird(University of Bristol), Maria Carolina Borges(University of Bristol), Jack Bowden(University of Bristol), Gibran Hemani(University of Bristol), Philip Haycock(University of Bristol), David M. Evans(University of Bristol), George Davey Smith(University of Bristol)
Current Epidemiology Reports
November 21, 2017
Cited by 1,257Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Mendelian randomization (MR) is a strategy for evaluating causality in observational epidemiological studies. MR exploits the fact that genotypes are not generally susceptible to reverse causation and confounding, due to their fixed nature and Mendel's First and Second Laws of Inheritance. MR has the potential to provide information on causality in many situations where randomized controlled trials are not possible, but the results of MR studies must be interpreted carefully to avoid drawing erroneous conclusions. RECENT FINDINGS: In this review, we outline the principles behind MR, as well as assumptions and limitations of the method. Extensions to the basic approach are discussed, including two-sample MR, bidirectional MR, two-step MR, multivariable MR, and factorial MR. We also consider some new applications and recent developments in the methodology, including its ability to inform drug development, automation of the method using tools such as MR-Base, and phenome-wide and hypothesis-free MR. SUMMARY: In conjunction with the growing availability of large-scale genomic databases, higher level of automation and increased robustness of the methods, MR promises to be a valuable strategy to examine causality in complex biological/omics networks, inform drug development and prioritize intervention targets for disease prevention in the future.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis