Restrictive or Liberal Red-Cell Transfusion for Cardiac Surgery

C. David Mazer(University of Toronto), Richard Whitlock(Health Sciences Centre), Dean Fergusson(St Michael's Hospital), Judith E. Hall(University of Toronto), Emilie P. Belley‐Côté(Population Health Research Institute), Katherine Connolly(Health Sciences Centre), Boris Khanykin(Copenhagen University Hospital), Alexander J. Gregory(St Michael's Hospital), Étienne de Médicis(St Michael's Hospital), Shay McGuinness(St Michael's Hospital), Alistair Royse(St Michael's Hospital), François Martin Carrier(Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal), Paul J. Young(Medical Research Institute of New Zealand), Juan Carlos Villar(Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga), Hilary P. Grocott(University of Manitoba), Manfred D. Seeberger(University of Basel), Stephen E. Fremes(University of Toronto), François Lellouche(Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec), Summer Syed(St Michael's Hospital), Kelly Byrne(St Michael's Hospital), Sean M. Bagshaw(St Michael's Hospital), Nian Chih Hwang(Singapore General Hospital), Chirag Mehta(St Michael's Hospital), Thomas Painter(St Michael's Hospital), Colin Royse(The Royal Melbourne Hospital), Subodh Verma(University of Toronto), Gregory M. T. Hare(St Michael's Hospital), Ashley Cohen(St. Michael's Hospital), Kevin E. Thorpe(St Michael's Hospital), Peter Jüni(St Michael's Hospital), Nadine Shehata(Sinai Hospital)
New England Journal of Medicine
November 12, 2017
Cited by 755Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The effect of a restrictive versus liberal red-cell transfusion strategy on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac surgery remains unclear. METHODS: In this multicenter, open-label, noninferiority trial, we randomly assigned 5243 adults undergoing cardiac surgery who had a European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) I of 6 or more (on a scale from 0 to 47, with higher scores indicating a higher risk of death after cardiac surgery) to a restrictive red-cell transfusion threshold (transfuse if hemoglobin level was <7.5 g per deciliter, starting from induction of anesthesia) or a liberal red-cell transfusion threshold (transfuse if hemoglobin level was <9.5 g per deciliter in the operating room or intensive care unit [ICU] or was <8.5 g per deciliter in the non-ICU ward). The primary composite outcome was death from any cause, myocardial infarction, stroke, or new-onset renal failure with dialysis by hospital discharge or by day 28, whichever came first. Secondary outcomes included red-cell transfusion and other clinical outcomes. RESULTS: The primary outcome occurred in 11.4% of the patients in the restrictive-threshold group, as compared with 12.5% of those in the liberal-threshold group (absolute risk difference, -1.11 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.93 to 0.72; odds ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.07; P<0.001 for noninferiority). Mortality was 3.0% in the restrictive-threshold group and 3.6% in the liberal-threshold group (odds ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.62 to 1.16). Red-cell transfusion occurred in 52.3% of the patients in the restrictive-threshold group, as compared with 72.6% of those in the liberal-threshold group (odds ratio, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.47). There were no significant between-group differences with regard to the other secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing cardiac surgery who were at moderate-to-high risk for death, a restrictive strategy regarding red-cell transfusion was noninferior to a liberal strategy with respect to the composite outcome of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, stroke, or new-onset renal failure with dialysis, with less blood transfused. (Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and others; TRICS III ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02042898 .).


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis