MONARCH 3: Abemaciclib As Initial Therapy for Advanced Breast Cancer

Matthew P. Goetz(National Cancer Center), Masakazu Toi(National Cancer Center), Mario Campone(National Cancer Center), Joohyuk Sohn(National Cancer Center), Shani Paluch–Shimon(National Cancer Center), Jens Huober(National Cancer Center), In Hae Park(National Cancer Center), Olivier Trédan(National Cancer Center), Shin‐Cheh Chen(National Cancer Center), Luís Manso(National Cancer Center), Orit Freedman(National Cancer Center), Georgina Garnica Jaliffe(National Cancer Center), Tammy Forrester(National Cancer Center), Martin Frenzel(National Cancer Center), Susana Barriga(National Cancer Center), Ian C. P. Smith(National Cancer Center), Nawel Bourayou(National Cancer Center), Angelo Di Leo(National Cancer Center)
Journal of Clinical Oncology
October 2, 2017
Cited by 1,707Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Purpose Abemaciclib, a cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitor, demonstrated efficacy as monotherapy and in combination with fulvestrant in women with hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced breast cancer previously treated with endocrine therapy. Methods MONARCH 3 is a double-blind, randomized phase III study of abemaciclib or placebo plus a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor in 493 postmenopausal women with HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer who had no prior systemic therapy in the advanced setting. Patients received abemaciclib or placebo (150 mg twice daily continuous schedule) plus either 1 mg anastrozole or 2.5 mg letrozole, daily. The primary objective was investigator-assessed progression-free survival. Secondary objectives included response evaluation and safety. A planned interim analysis occurred after 189 events. Results Median progression-free survival was significantly prolonged in the abemaciclib arm (hazard ratio, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.72; P = .000021; median: not reached in the abemaciclib arm, 14.7 months in the placebo arm). In patients with measurable disease, the objective response rate was 59% in the abemaciclib arm and 44% in the placebo arm ( P = .004). In the abemaciclib arm, diarrhea was the most frequent adverse effect (81.3%) but was mainly grade 1 (44.6%). Comparing abemaciclib and placebo, the most frequent grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia (21.1% v 1.2%), diarrhea (9.5% v 1.2%), and leukopenia (7.6% v 0.6%). Conclusion Abemaciclib plus a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor was effective as initial therapy, significantly improving progression-free survival and objective response rate and demonstrating a tolerable safety profile in women with HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis