Assessing Monkeypox Virus Prevalence in Small Mammals at the Human–Animal Interface in the Democratic Republic of the Congo

Jeffrey B. Doty(Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), Jean Malekani(University of Kinshasa), Lem’s N. Kalemba(University of Kinshasa), William T. Stanley(Field Museum of Natural History), Benjamin Monroe(Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), Yoshinori Nakazawa(Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), Matthew R. Mauldin(Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), Trésor L. Bakambana(University of Kinshasa), Tobit L. D. Liyandja(University of Kinshasa), Zachary Braden(Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), Ryan Wallace(Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), Divin Malekani(University of Kinshasa), Andrea M. McCollum(Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), Nadia Gallardo‐Romero(Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), Ashley V. Kondas(Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), A. Townsend Peterson(University of Kansas), Jorge E. Osorio(University of Wisconsin–Madison), Tonie E. Rocke(United States Geological Survey), Kevin L. Karem(Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), Ginny L. Emerson(Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), Darin S. Carroll(Centers for Disease Control and Prevention)
Viruses
October 3, 2017
Cited by 241Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

During 2012, 2013 and 2015, we collected small mammals within 25 km of the town of Boende in Tshuapa Province, the Democratic Republic of the Congo. The prevalence of monkeypox virus (MPXV) in this area is unknown; however, cases of human infection were previously confirmed near these collection sites. Samples were collected from 353 mammals (rodents, shrews, pangolins, elephant shrews, a potamogale, and a hyrax). Some rodents and shrews were captured from houses where human monkeypox cases have recently been identified, but most were trapped in forests and agricultural areas near villages. Real-time PCR and ELISA were used to assess evidence of MPXV infection and other Orthopoxvirus (OPXV) infections in these small mammals. Seven (2.0%) of these animal samples were found to be anti-orthopoxvirus immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody positive (six rodents: two Funisciurus spp.; one Graphiurus lorraineus; one Cricetomys emini; one Heliosciurus sp.; one Oenomys hypoxanthus, and one elephant shrew Petrodromus tetradactylus); no individuals were found positive in PCR-based assays. These results suggest that a variety of animals can be infected with OPXVs, and that epidemiology studies and educational campaigns should focus on animals that people are regularly contacting, including larger rodents used as protein sources.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis