Nivolumab Versus Docetaxel in Previously Treated Patients With Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Two-Year Outcomes From Two Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Trials (CheckMate 017 and CheckMate 057)

Leora Horn(Heidelberg University), David R. Spigel(Heidelberg University), Everett E. Vokes(Heidelberg University), Esther Holgado(Heidelberg University), Neal Ready(Heidelberg University), Martin Steins(Heidelberg University), Elena Poddubskaya(Heidelberg University), Hossein Borghaei(Heidelberg University), Enriqueta Felip(Heidelberg University), Luis Paz‐Ares(Heidelberg University), Adam Płużański(Heidelberg University), Karen L. Reckamp(Heidelberg University), Marco Angelo Burgio(Heidelberg University), Martin Kohlhäeufl(Heidelberg University), David Waterhouse(Heidelberg University), Fabrice Barlési(Heidelberg University), Scott Antonia(Heidelberg University), Óscar Arrieta(Heidelberg University), Jérôme Fayette(Heidelberg University), Lucio Crinò(Heidelberg University), Naiyer A. Rizvi(Heidelberg University), Martin Reck(Heidelberg University), Matthew D. Hellmann(Heidelberg University), William J. Geese(Heidelberg University), Ang Li(Heidelberg University), Anne Blackwood‐Chirchir(Heidelberg University), Diane Healey(Heidelberg University), Julie R. Brahmer(Heidelberg University), Wilfried Eberhardt(Heidelberg University)
Journal of Clinical Oncology
October 12, 2017
Cited by 873Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Purpose Nivolumab, a programmed death-1 inhibitor, prolonged overall survival compared with docetaxel in two independent phase III studies in previously treated patients with advanced squamous (CheckMate 017; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01642004) or nonsquamous (CheckMate 057; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01673867) non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We report updated results, including a pooled analysis of the two studies. Methods Patients with stage IIIB/IV squamous (N = 272) or nonsquamous (N = 582) NSCLC and disease progression during or after prior platinum-based chemotherapy were randomly assigned 1:1 to nivolumab (3 mg/kg every 2 weeks) or docetaxel (75 mg/m 2 every 3 weeks). Minimum follow-up for survival was 24.2 months. Results Two-year overall survival rates with nivolumab versus docetaxel were 23% (95% CI, 16% to 30%) versus 8% (95% CI, 4% to 13%) in squamous NSCLC and 29% (95% CI, 24% to 34%) versus 16% (95% CI, 12% to 20%) in nonsquamous NSCLC; relative reductions in the risk of death with nivolumab versus docetaxel remained similar to those reported in the primary analyses. Durable responses were observed with nivolumab; 10 (37%) of 27 confirmed responders with squamous NSCLC and 19 (34%) of 56 with nonsquamous NSCLC had ongoing responses after 2 years’ minimum follow-up. No patient in either docetaxel group had an ongoing response. In the pooled analysis, the relative reduction in the risk of death with nivolumab versus docetaxel was 28% (hazard ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.84), and rates of treatment-related adverse events were lower with nivolumab than with docetaxel (any grade, 68% v 88%; grade 3 to 4, 10% v 55%). Conclusion Nivolumab provides long-term clinical benefit and a favorable tolerability profile compared with docetaxel in previously treated patients with advanced NSCLC.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis