International consensus guidelines for scoring the histopathological growth patterns of liver metastasis

Pieter‐Jan van Dam(GZA Ziekenhuizen Campus Sint-Augustinus), Eric P. van der Stok(Erasmus MC Cancer Institute), Laure-Anne Teuwen(GZA Ziekenhuizen Campus Sint-Augustinus), Gert G. Van den Eynden(GZA Ziekenhuizen Campus Sint-Augustinus), Martin Illemann(Rigshospitalet), Sophia Frentzas(Breast Cancer Now), Ali W. Majeed(Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust), Rikke Løvendahl Eefsen(Næstved Sygehus), Robert R.J. Coebergh van den Braak(Erasmus MC Cancer Institute), Anthoula Lazaris(McGill University Health Centre), María Celia Fernández(McGill University Health Centre), Boris Galjart(Erasmus MC Cancer Institute), Ole Didrik Lærum(University of Copenhagen), Roni Rayes(McGill University Health Centre), Dirk J. Grünhagen(Erasmus MC Cancer Institute), Michelle Van de paer(GZA Ziekenhuizen Campus Sint-Augustinus), Yves Sucaet(Vrije Universiteit Brussel), Hardeep Singh Mudhar(Royal Hallamshire Hospital), Michael Schvimer(Sheba Medical Center), Hanna Nyström(Umeå University), Mark Kockx(HistoGeneX (Belgium)), Nigel C. Bird(University of Sheffield), Fernando Vidal‐Vanaclocha(Valencia Catholic University Saint Vincent Martyr), Peter Metrakos(McGill University Health Centre), Ève Simoneau(McGill University Health Centre), Cornelis Verhoef(Erasmus MC Cancer Institute), Luc Dirix(GZA Ziekenhuizen Campus Sint-Augustinus), Steven Van Laere(GZA Ziekenhuizen Campus Sint-Augustinus), Zu‐Hua Gao(McGill University), Pnina Brodt(McGill University Health Centre), Andrew R. Reynolds(Breast Cancer Now), Peter Vermeulen(HistoGeneX (Belgium))
British Journal of Cancer
October 5, 2017
Cited by 228Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Liver metastases present with distinct histopathological growth patterns (HGPs), including the desmoplastic, pushing and replacement HGPs and two rarer HGPs. The HGPs are defined owing to the distinct interface between the cancer cells and the adjacent normal liver parenchyma that is present in each pattern and can be scored from standard haematoxylin-and-eosin-stained (H&E) tissue sections. The current study provides consensus guidelines for scoring these HGPs. METHODS: Guidelines for defining the HGPs were established by a large international team. To assess the validity of these guidelines, 12 independent observers scored a set of 159 liver metastases and interobserver variability was measured. In an independent cohort of 374 patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRCLM), the impact of HGPs on overall survival after hepatectomy was determined. RESULTS: Good-to-excellent correlations (intraclass correlation coefficient >0.5) with the gold standard were obtained for the assessment of the replacement HGP and desmoplastic HGP. Overall survival was significantly superior in the desmoplastic HGP subgroup compared with the replacement or pushing HGP subgroup (P=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: The current guidelines allow for reproducible determination of liver metastasis HGPs. As HGPs impact overall survival after surgery for CRCLM, they may serve as a novel biomarker for individualised therapies.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis