Electronic Properties of Bulk and Monolayer TMDs: Theoretical Study Within DFT Framework (GVJ‐2e Method)

Julia Gusakova(Nanyang Technological University), Xingli Wang(Nanyang Technological University), Li Lynn Shiau(Nanyang Technological University), А. В. Кривошеева(Belarusian State University of Informatics and Radioelectronics), В. Л. Шапошников(Belarusian State University of Informatics and Radioelectronics), В. Е. Борисенко(Belarusian State University of Informatics and Radioelectronics), V. E. Gusakov(Materials Research Center), Beng Kang Tay(Nanyang Technological University)
physica status solidi (a)
September 28, 2017
Cited by 450

Abstract

Accurate prediction of band gap for new emerging materials is highly desirable for the exploration of potential applications. The band gaps of bulk and monolayer TMDs (MoS 2 , MoSe 2 , WS 2 , and WSe 2 ) are calculated with the recently proposed by us GVJ‐2e method, which is implemented within DFT framework without adjustable parameters and is based on the total energies only. The calculated band gaps are in very good agreement with experimental ones for both bulk and monolayer TMDs. For monolayer MoS 2 , MoSe 2 , WS 2 , and WSe 2 , direct band gaps are predicted to be 1.88 eV, 1.57 eV, 2.03 eV, 1.67 eV correspondingly, and for bulk TMDs, indirect band gaps of 1.23 eV (MoS 2 ), 1.09 eV (MoSe 2 ), 1.32 eV (WS 2 ), 1.21 eV (WSe 2 ) are predicted. The GVJ‐2e method demonstrates good accuracy with mean absolute error (MAE) of about 0.03 eV for TMDs PL gaps (and 0.06 eV for QP gaps). GVJ‐2e method allows to equally accurately obtain band gaps for 3D and 2D materials. The errors of GVJ‐2e method are significantly smaller than errors of other widely used methods such as GW (MAE 0.23 eV), hybrid functional HSE (MAE 0.17 eV), TB‐mBJ functional (MAE 0.14 eV).


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis