Liquid biopsy in colon cancer: comparison of different circulating DNA extraction systems following absolute quantification of <i>KRAS</i> mutations using Intplex allele-specific PCR

Vera Kloten(Universitätsklinikum Aachen), Nadine Rüchel(RWTH Aachen University), Nadina Ortiz Brüchle(RWTH Aachen University), Janina Gasthaus(RWTH Aachen University), Nils Freudenmacher(RWTH Aachen University), Florian Steib(Universitätsklinikum Aachen), Jolein Mijnes(RWTH Aachen University), Julian Eschenbruch(Universitätsklinikum Aachen), Marcel Binnebösel(Universitätsklinikum Aachen), Ruth Knüchel(Universitätsklinikum Aachen), Edgar Dahl(Universitätsklinikum Aachen)
Oncotarget
September 21, 2017
Cited by 73Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

// Vera Kloten 1 , Nadine R&uuml;chel 1 , Nadina Ortiz Br&uuml;chle 1 , Janina Gasthaus 1 , Nils Freudenmacher 1, 2 , Florian Steib 1 , Jolein Mijnes 1 , Julian Eschenbruch 1 , Marcel Binneb&ouml;sel 3 , Ruth Kn&uuml;chel 1 and Edgar Dahl 1, 2 1 Molecular Oncology Group, Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany 2 Centralized Biomaterial Bank of RWTH Aachen University (RWTH cBMB), Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany 3 Department of Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany Correspondence to: Vera Kloten, email: vkloten@ukaachen.de Keywords: liquid biopsy, KRAS, cfDNA extraction systems, ctDNA quantification, intplex-allele specific PCR Received: November 30, 2016&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Accepted: August 05, 2017&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Published: September 21, 2017 ABSTRACT Non-invasive molecular analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a promising application in personalized cancer management, although there is still much to learn about the biological characteristics of ctDNA. The present study compared absolute amounts of KRAS mutated ctDNA and total circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients (n=50) from various stages and healthy controls (n=8) by Intplex allele-specific and digital droplet PCR. In addition, the impact of two prominent extraction techniques (silica-based membrane vs. magnetic beads) on cfDNA and ctDNA recovery was analyzed in 38 paired samples from CRC patients and specific spike-in DNA controls. CfDNA fragment size was assessed using the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer. Relative quantities of total cfDNA quantities were measured using the Qubit fluorometer. Statistical analysis on total cfDNA yield revealed a strong correlation (r=0.976) between Qubit and absolute Intplex allele-specific PCR measurements in cancer patients and healthy controls. Total cfDNA was significantly increased in cancer patients compared to healthy controls, with the highest yield in distant metastatic disease. In line, the highest amount of ctDNA (1.35 ng/&mu;L) was found in patients with distant organ metastasis. Of great interest, the silica-based membrane method significantly promoted extraction of long cfDNA fragments. In contrast, the magnetic bead system more efficiently recovered short cfDNA fragments in serum of cancer patients. Further, a decreased KRAS allele frequency was observed in serum compared to plasma. This study suggests that the source of cfDNA and choice of pre-analytical extraction systems needs to be more carefully validated in routine clinical practice.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis