The New Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra: Improving Detection of <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i> and Resistance to Rifampin in an Assay Suitable for Point-of-Care Testing

Soumitesh Chakravorty(Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey), Ann Marie Simmons, Mazhgan Rowneki(Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey), Heta Parmar(Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey), Yuan Cao(Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey), Jamie Ryan, Padmapriya P. Banada(Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey), Srinidhi Deshpande(Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey), Shubhada Shenai(Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey), Alexander Gall, Jennifer S. Glass, Barry Krieswirth(Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey), Samuel G. Schumacher(FIND), Pamela Nabeta(FIND), Nestani Tukvadze(National Center for Tuberculosis and Lung Disease), Camilla Rodrigues(P. D. Hinduja Hospital and Medical Research Centre), Alena Skrahina(Republican Scientific and Practical Centre of Pulmonology and Tuberculosis), Elisa Tagliani(San Raffaele University of Rome), Daniela María Cirillo(San Raffaele University of Rome), Amy L. Davidow(Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey), Claudia M. Denkinger(FIND), David H. Persing, Robert Kwiatkowski, Martin Jones, David Alland(Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey)
mBio
August 30, 2017
Cited by 654Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

ABSTRACT The Xpert MTB/RIF assay (Xpert) is a rapid test for tuberculosis (TB) and rifampin resistance (RIF-R) suitable for point-of-care testing. However, it has decreased sensitivity in smear-negative sputum, and false identification of RIF-R occasionally occurs. We developed the Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra assay (Ultra) to improve performance. Ultra and Xpert limits of detection (LOD), dynamic ranges, and RIF-R rpoB mutation detection were tested on Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA or sputum samples spiked with known numbers of M. tuberculosis H37Rv or Mycobacterium bovis BCG CFU. Frozen and prospectively collected clinical samples from patients suspected of having TB, with and without culture-confirmed TB, were also tested. For M. tuberculosis H37Rv, the LOD was 15.6 CFU/ml of sputum for Ultra versus 112.6 CFU/ml of sputum for Xpert, and for M. bovis BCG, it was 143.4 CFU/ml of sputum for Ultra versus 344 CFU/ml of sputum for Xpert. Ultra resulted in no false-positive RIF-R specimens, while Xpert resulted in two false-positive RIF-R specimens. All RIF-R-associated M. tuberculosis rpoB mutations tested were identified by Ultra. Testing on clinical sputum samples, Ultra versus Xpert, resulted in an overall sensitivity of 87.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 82.1, 91.7) versus 81.0% (95% CI, 74.9, 86.2) and a sensitivity on sputum smear-negative samples of 78.9% (95% CI, 70.0, 86.1) versus 66.1% (95% CI, 56.4, 74.9). Both tests had a specificity of 98.7% (95% CI, 93.0, 100), and both had comparable accuracies for detection of RIF-R in these samples. Ultra should significantly improve TB detection, especially in patients with paucibacillary disease, and may provide more-reliable RIF-R detection. IMPORTANCE The Xpert MTB/RIF assay (Xpert), the first point-of-care assay for tuberculosis (TB), was endorsed by the World Health Organization in December 2010. Since then, 23 million Xpert tests have been procured in 130 countries. Although Xpert showed high overall sensitivity and specificity with pulmonary samples, its sensitivity has been lower with smear-negative pulmonary samples and extrapulmonary samples. In addition, the prediction of rifampin resistance (RIF-R) in paucibacillary samples and for a few rpoB mutations has resulted in both false-positive and false-negative results. The present study is the first demonstration of the design features and operational characteristics of an improved Xpert Ultra assay. This study also shows that the Ultra format overcomes many of the known shortcomings of Xpert. The new assay should significantly improve TB detection, especially in patients with paucibacillary disease, and provide more-reliable detection of RIF-R.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis