Assessment of imatinib as first-line treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia: 10-year survival results of the randomized CML study IV and impact of non-CML determinants

for the SAKK and the German CML Study Group(Heidelberg University), Rüdiger Hehlmann(Heidelberg University), Michael Lauseker(Heidelberg University), Susanne Saußele(Heidelberg University), Markus Pfirrmann(Universitätsklinikum Erlangen), Stefan W. Krause(Universitätsklinikum Erlangen), Hans‐Jochem Kolb, Andreas Neubauer(Universität Hamburg), Dieter K. Hossfeld(Universität Hamburg), C. Nerl(University Hospital of Basel), Aloïs Gratwohl(University Hospital of Bern), Gabriela M. Baerlocher(University Hospital of Bern), Dominik Heim(University Hospital of Basel), Tim H. Brümmendorf(Heidelberg University), Alice Fabarius(Heidelberg University), Claudia Haferlach(Munich Leukemia Laboratory (Germany)), Brigitte Schlegelberger(Heidelberg University), Marcus Müller(Heidelberg University), Sabine Jeromin(Heidelberg University), Ulrike Proetel(Heidelberg University), Katharina Kohlbrenner(Heidelberg University), Astghik Voskanyan(Heidelberg University), Sébastien Rinaldetti(Heidelberg University), Wolfgang Seifarth(Heidelberg University), Birgit Spieß(Heidelberg University), Leopold Balleisen(Universitätsklinikum Würzburg), M-E Goebeler(Universitätsklinikum Würzburg), Mathias Hänel(Universität Hamburg), Anthony D. Ho(Heidelberg University), Jolanta Dengler(Nuremberg Hospital), Christiane Falge(Universitätsklinikum Tübingen), Lothar Kanz(Universitätsklinikum Tübingen), Stephan Kremers(Caritas-Krankenhaus St. Josef), Andreas Burchert(University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein), Michael Kneba(University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein), Frank Stegelmann(Klinikum Oldenburg), Claus-Henning Köhne(Klinikum Oldenburg), H. W. Lindemann(University Medical Center Freiburg), Cornelius F. Waller(University Medical Center Freiburg), M. Pfreundschuh(Saarland University), Karsten Spiekermann(University Hospital Münster), Wolfgang E. Berdel(University Hospital Münster), Lothar Müller(University Hospital Regensburg), Matthias Edinger(Masaryk University), Jiřı́ Mayer(Masaryk University), Dietrich W. Beelen(Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe), Martin Bentz(Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe), Hartmut Link(Westpfalz Klinikum), Bernd Hertenstein(Klinikum Bremen-Mitte), Roland J. Fuchs(Kantonsspital Aarau), Martin Wernli(Sankt-Antonius-Hospital Eschweiler), Frank Schlegel(Sankt-Antonius-Hospital Eschweiler), Rudolf Schlag(Vivantes Klinikum), Maike de Wit(Vivantes Klinikum), Lorenz Trümper(Universitätsmedizin Göttingen), Holger Hebart, Markus Hahn(Praxis für Hämatologie und Onkologie), Jörg Thomalla(Praxis für Hämatologie und Onkologie), Christof Scheid(Universität Hamburg), Philippe Schafhausen(Universität Hamburg), Walter Verbeek(Praxis für Hämatologie und Onkologie), Michael J. Eckart, W. Gaßmann(Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin), Antonio Pezzutto(Krankenhaus Barmherzige Brüder), Michael Schenk(Krankenhaus Barmherzige Brüder), Peter Brossart(Evangelisches Diakoniekrankenhaus), Thomas Geer(Herford Hospital), Stephan Bildat(Herford Hospital), E. Schäfer(Jena University Hospital), Andreas Hochhaus(Jena University Hospital), Joerg Hasford(Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München)
Leukemia
August 14, 2017
Cited by 337Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML)-study IV was designed to explore whether treatment with imatinib (IM) at 400 mg/day (n=400) could be optimized by doubling the dose (n=420), adding interferon (IFN) (n=430) or cytarabine (n=158) or using IM after IFN-failure (n=128). From July 2002 to March 2012, 1551 newly diagnosed patients in chronic phase were randomized into a 5-arm study. The study was powered to detect a survival difference of 5% at 5 years. After a median observation time of 9.5 years, 10-year overall survival was 82%, 10-year progression-free survival was 80% and 10-year relative survival was 92%. Survival between IM400 mg and any experimental arm was not different. In a multivariate analysis, risk group, major-route chromosomal aberrations, comorbidities, smoking and treatment center (academic vs other) influenced survival significantly, but not any form of treatment optimization. Patients reaching the molecular response milestones at 3, 6 and 12 months had a significant survival advantage. For responders, monotherapy with IM400 mg provides a close to normal life expectancy independent of the time to response. Survival is more determined by patients' and disease factors than by initial treatment selection. Although improvements are also needed for refractory disease, more life-time can currently be gained by carefully addressing non-CML determinants of survival.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis