Health Status Benefits of Transcatheter vs Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis at Intermediate Surgical Risk
Suzanne J. Baron(Harvard University), Michael J. Mack(Baylor Jack and Jane Hamilton Heart and Vascular Hospital), Susheel Kodali(Columbia University Irving Medical Center), Lars G. Svensson(Cleveland Clinic), Suzanne V. Arnold(Saint Luke's Health System), Raj Makkar(Cedars-Sinai Medical Center), Howard C. Herrmann(University of Pennsylvania), Elizabeth A. Magnuson(Saint Luke's Health System), Samir Kapadia(Cleveland Clinic), David J. Cohen(Baim Institute for Clinical Research), David L. Brown(Baylor Scott & White Health), Kaijun Wang(Saint Luke's Hospital), Martin B. Leon(Columbia University Irving Medical Center), Craig R. Smith(University of Arizona), Vinod H. Thourani(Valve (United States)), Khaja Chinnakondepali(Saint Luke's Hospital)
Cited by 142
Related Papers
Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Implantation for Aortic Stenosis in Patients Who Cannot Undergo Surgery
|New England Journal of Medicine|2010|7.2k
Transcatheter versus Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement in High-Risk Patients
|New England Journal of Medicine|2011|6.4k
Clinical End Points in Coronary Stent Trials
|Circulation|2007|5.4k
Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement in Intermediate-Risk Patients
|New England Journal of Medicine|2016|5.1k
Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement with a Balloon-Expandable Valve in Low-Risk Patients
|New England Journal of Medicine|2019|4.8k