First-Line Nivolumab in Stage IV or Recurrent Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

David P. Carbone(Heidelberg University), Martin Reck(Heidelberg University), Luis Paz‐Ares(Heidelberg University), Ben Creelan(Heidelberg University), Leora Horn(Heidelberg University), Martin Steins(Heidelberg University), Enriqueta Felip(Hebron University), Michel M. van den Heuvel(Heidelberg University), Tudor–Eliade Ciuleanu(Heidelberg University), Firas Badin(Heidelberg University), Neal Ready(Duke University), T. Jeroen N. Hiltermann(University Medical Center Groningen), Suresh Nair(Heidelberg University), Rosalyn A. Juergens(Heidelberg University), Solange Peters(Heidelberg University), Elisa Minenza(Heidelberg University), John Wrangle(Heidelberg University), Delvys Rodríguez‐Abreu(Heidelberg University), Hossein Borghaei(Fox Chase Cancer Center), George R. Blumenschein(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Liza C. Villaruz(Heidelberg University), Libor Havel(Heidelberg University), Jana Krejčí(Heidelberg University), Jesus Corral Jaime(Heidelberg University), Han Chang(Heidelberg University), William J. Geese(Heidelberg University), Prabhu Bhagavatheeswaran(Heidelberg University), Allen C. Chen(Heidelberg University), Mark A. Socinski(Heidelberg University)
New England Journal of Medicine
June 21, 2017
Cited by 2,570Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nivolumab has been associated with longer overall survival than docetaxel among patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In an open-label phase 3 trial, we compared first-line nivolumab with chemotherapy in patients with programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive NSCLC. METHODS: We randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, patients with untreated stage IV or recurrent NSCLC and a PD-L1 tumor-expression level of 1% or more to receive nivolumab (administered intravenously at a dose of 3 mg per kilogram of body weight once every 2 weeks) or platinum-based chemotherapy (administered once every 3 weeks for up to six cycles). Patients receiving chemotherapy could cross over to receive nivolumab at the time of disease progression. The primary end point was progression-free survival, as assessed by means of blinded independent central review, among patients with a PD-L1 expression level of 5% or more. RESULTS: Among the 423 patients with a PD-L1 expression level of 5% or more, the median progression-free survival was 4.2 months with nivolumab versus 5.9 months with chemotherapy (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 1.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91 to 1.45; P=0.25), and the median overall survival was 14.4 months versus 13.2 months (hazard ratio for death, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.80 to 1.30). A total of 128 of 212 patients (60%) in the chemotherapy group received nivolumab as subsequent therapy. Treatment-related adverse events of any grade occurred in 71% of the patients who received nivolumab and in 92% of those who received chemotherapy. Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or 4 occurred in 18% of the patients who received nivolumab and in 51% of those who received chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Nivolumab was not associated with significantly longer progression-free survival than chemotherapy among patients with previously untreated stage IV or recurrent NSCLC with a PD-L1 expression level of 5% or more. Overall survival was similar between groups. Nivolumab had a favorable safety profile, as compared with chemotherapy, with no new or unexpected safety signals. (Funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb and others; CheckMate 026 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02041533 .).


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis