MONARCH 2: Abemaciclib in Combination With Fulvestrant in Women With HR+/HER2− Advanced Breast Cancer Who Had Progressed While Receiving Endocrine Therapy

George W. Sledge(Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven), Masakazu Toi(Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven), Patrick Neven(Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven), Joohyuk Sohn(Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven), Kenichi Inoue(Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven), Xavier Pivot(Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven), Olga Burdaeva(Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven), Meena Okera(Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven), Norikazu Masuda(Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven), Peter A. Kaufman(Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven), Han Koh(Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven), Eva‐Maria Grischke(Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven), Martin Frenzel(Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven), Yong Lin(Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven), Susana Barriga(Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven), Ian C. P. Smith(Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven), Nawel Bourayou(Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven), Antonio Llombart‐Cussac(Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven)
Journal of Clinical Oncology
June 3, 2017
Cited by 1,652Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Purpose MONARCH 2 ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02107703) compared the efficacy and safety of abemaciclib, a selective cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitor, plus fulvestrant with fulvestrant alone in patients with advanced breast cancer (ABC). Patients and Methods MONARCH 2 was a global, double-blind, phase III study of women with hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative ABC who had progressed while receiving neoadjuvant or adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET), ≤ 12 months from the end of adjuvant ET, or while receiving first-line ET for metastatic disease. Patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive abemaciclib or placebo (150 mg twice daily) on a continuous schedule and fulvestrant (500 mg, per label). The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS), and key secondary end points included overall survival, objective response rate (ORR), duration of response, clinical benefit rate, quality of life, and safety. Results Between August 2014 and December 2015, 669 patients were randomly assigned to receive abemaciclib plus fulvestrant (n = 446) or placebo plus fulvestrant (n = 223). Abemaciclib plus fulvestrant significantly extended PFS versus fulvestrant alone (median, 16.4 v 9.3 months; hazard ratio, 0.553; 95% CI, 0.449 to 0.681; P < .001). In patients with measurable disease, abemaciclib plus fulvestrant achieved an ORR of 48.1% (95% CI, 42.6% to 53.6%) compared with 21.3% (95% CI, 15.1% to 27.6%) in the control arm. The most common adverse events in the abemaciclib versus placebo arms were diarrhea (86.4% v 24.7%), neutropenia (46.0% v 4.0%), nausea (45.1% v 22.9%), and fatigue (39.9% v 26.9%). Conclusions Abemaciclib at 150 mg twice daily plus fulvestrant was effective, significantly improving PFS and ORR and demonstrating a tolerable safety profile in women with hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative ABC who progressed while receiving ET.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis