Adjuvant Capecitabine for Breast Cancer after Preoperative Chemotherapy

Norikazu Masuda(Osaka National Hospital), Soo-Jung Lee(National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center), Shoichiro Ohtani(National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center), Young‐Hyuck Im(Sungkyunkwan University), Eun Sook Lee(National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center), Isao Yokota(National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center), Katsumasa Kuroi(National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center), Seock‐Ah Im(Seoul National University Hospital), Byeong‐Woo Park(National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center), Sung‐Bae Kim(University of Ulsan), Yasuhiro Yanagita(National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center), Shinji Ohno(National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center), Shintaro Takao(National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center), Kenjiro Aogi(National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center), Hiroji Iwata(National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center), Joon Jeong(Gangnam Severance Hospital), Aeree Kim(National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center), Kyong Hwa Park(National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center), Hironobu Sasano(Tohoku University), Yasuo Ohashi(National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center), Masakazu Toi(Kyoto University)
New England Journal of Medicine
May 31, 2017
Cited by 1,876Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients who have residual invasive carcinoma after the receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer have poor prognoses. The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in these patients remains unclear. METHODS: We randomly assigned 910 patients with HER2-negative residual invasive breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (containing anthracycline, taxane, or both) to receive standard postsurgical treatment either with capecitabine or without (control). The primary end point was disease-free survival. Secondary end points included overall survival. RESULTS: The result of the prespecified interim analysis met the primary end point, so this trial was terminated early. The final analysis showed that disease-free survival was longer in the capecitabine group than in the control group (74.1% vs. 67.6% of the patients were alive and free from recurrence or second cancer at 5 years; hazard ratio for recurrence, second cancer, or death, 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.53 to 0.92; P=0.01). Overall survival was longer in the capecitabine group than in the control group (89.2% vs. 83.6% of the patients were alive at 5 years; hazard ratio for death, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.90; P=0.01). Among patients with triple-negative disease, the rate of disease-free survival was 69.8% in the capecitabine group versus 56.1% in the control group (hazard ratio for recurrence, second cancer, or death, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.87), and the overall survival rate was 78.8% versus 70.3% (hazard ratio for death, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.90). The hand-foot syndrome, the most common adverse reaction to capecitabine, occurred in 73.4% of the patients in the capecitabine group. CONCLUSIONS: After standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy containing anthracycline, taxane, or both, the addition of adjuvant capecitabine therapy was safe and effective in prolonging disease-free survival and overall survival among patients with HER2-negative breast cancer who had residual invasive disease on pathological testing. (Funded by the Advanced Clinical Research Organization and the Japan Breast Cancer Research Group; CREATE-X UMIN Clinical Trials Registry number, UMIN000000843 .).


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis