The landscape of BRAF transcript and protein variants in human cancer

Andrea Marranci(University of Siena), Zhijie Jiang(University of Miami), Marianna Vitiello(Istituto di Fisiologia Clinica), Elena Guzzolino(Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna), Laura Comelli(Istituto di Fisiologia Clinica), Samanta Sarti(University of Siena), Simone Lubrano(University of Siena), Cinzia Franchin(University of Padua), Ileabett M. Echevarría-Vargas(The Wistar Institute), Andrea Tuccoli(Istituto di Fisiologia Clinica), Alberto Mercatanti(Istituto di Fisiologia Clinica), Monica Evangelista(Istituto di Fisiologia Clinica), Paolo Sportoletti(University of Perugia), Giorgio Cozza(University of Padua), Ettore Luzi(University of Florence), Enrico Capobianco(University of Miami), Jessie Villanueva(The Wistar Institute), Giorgio Arrigoni(University of Padua), Giovanni Signore(Center for Nanotechnology Innovation), Silvia Rocchiccioli(Istituto di Fisiologia Clinica), Letizia Pitto(Istituto di Fisiologia Clinica), Nicholas F. Tsinoremas(University of Miami), Laura Poliseno(Istituto di Fisiologia Clinica)
Molecular Cancer
April 28, 2017
Cited by 51Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The BRAF protein kinase is widely studied as a cancer driver and therapeutic target. However, the regulation of its expression is not completely understood. RESULTS: Taking advantage of the RNA-seq data of more than 4800 patients belonging to 9 different cancer types, we show that BRAF mRNA exists as a pool of 3 isoforms (reference BRAF, BRAF-X1, and BRAF-X2) that differ in the last part of their coding sequences, as well as in the length (BRAF-ref: 76 nt; BRAF-X1 and BRAF-X2: up to 7 kb) and in the sequence of their 3'UTRs. The expression levels of BRAF-ref and BRAF-X1/X2 are inversely correlated, while the most prevalent among the three isoforms varies from cancer type to cancer type. In melanoma cells, the X1 isoform is expressed at the highest level in both therapy-naïve cells and cells with acquired resistance to vemurafenib driven by BRAF gene amplification or expression of the Δ[3-10] splicing variant. In addition to the BRAF-ref protein, the BRAF-X1 protein (the full length as well as the Δ[3-10] variant) is also translated. The expression levels of the BRAF-ref and BRAF-X1 proteins are similar, and together they account for BRAF functional activities. In contrast, the endogenous BRAF-X2 protein is hard to detect because the C-terminal domain is selectively recognized by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway and targeted for degradation. CONCLUSIONS: By shedding light on the repertoire of BRAF mRNA and protein variants, and on the complex regulation of their expression, our work paves the way to a deeper understanding of a crucially important player in human cancer and to a more informed development of new therapeutic strategies.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis