Randomized Trial of a Hypofractionated Radiation Regimen for the Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer

Charles Catton(McMaster University), Himu Lukka(McMaster University), Chu‐Shu Gu(McMaster University), Jarad Martin(McMaster University), S. Supiot(McMaster University), Peter Chung(McMaster University), Glenn Bauman(McMaster University), Jean-Paul Bahary(McMaster University), Shahida Ahmed(McMaster University), Patrick Cheung(McMaster University), Keen Hun Tai(McMaster University), Jackson Wu(McMaster University), Matthew Parliament(McMaster University), Theodoros Tsakiridis(McMaster University), Tom Corbett(McMaster University), Colin Tang(McMaster University), Ian S. Dayes(McMaster University), Padraig Warde(McMaster University), Tim Craig(McMaster University), Jim A. Julian(McMaster University), Mark N. Levine(McMaster University)
Journal of Clinical Oncology
March 15, 2017
Cited by 711

Abstract

Purpose Men with localized prostate cancer often are treated with external radiotherapy (RT) over 8 to 9 weeks. Hypofractionated RT is given over a shorter time with larger doses per treatment than standard RT. We hypothesized that hypofractionation versus conventional fractionation is similar in efficacy without increased toxicity. Patients and Methods We conducted a multicenter randomized noninferiority trial in intermediate-risk prostate cancer (T1 to 2a, Gleason score ≤ 6, and prostate-specific antigen [PSA] 10.1 to 20 ng/mL; T2b to 2c, Gleason ≤ 6, and PSA ≤ 20 ng/mL; or T1 to 2, Gleason = 7, and PSA ≤ 20 ng/mL). Patients were allocated to conventional RT of 78 Gy in 39 fractions over 8 weeks or to hypofractionated RT of 60 Gy in 20 fractions over 4 weeks. Androgen deprivation was not permitted with therapy. The primary outcome was biochemical-clinical failure (BCF) defined by any of the following: PSA failure (nadir + 2), hormonal intervention, clinical local or distant failure, or death as a result of prostate cancer. The noninferiority margin was 7.5% (hazard ratio, < 1.32). Results Median follow-up was 6.0 years. One hundred nine of 608 patients in the hypofractionated arm versus 117 of 598 in the standard arm experienced BCF. Most of the events were PSA failures. The 5-year BCF disease-free survival was 85% in both arms (hazard ratio [short v standard], 0.96; 90% CI, 0.77 to 1.2). Ten deaths as a result of prostate cancer occurred in the short arm and 12 in the standard arm. No significant differences were detected between arms for grade ≥ 3 late genitourinary and GI toxicity. Conclusion The hypofractionated RT regimen used in this trial was not inferior to conventional RT and was not associated with increased late toxicity. Hypofractionated RT is more convenient for patients and should be considered for intermediate-risk prostate cancer.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis