NEOZOTAC: Efficacy results from a phase III randomized trial with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (TAC) with or without zoledronic acid for patients with HER2-negative large resectable or stage II or III breast cancer (BC)—A Dutch Breast Cancer Trialists’ Group (BOOG) study.

Ayoub Charehbili(Leiden University Medical Center), Saskia van de Ven(Leiden University Medical Center), Gerrit‐Jan Liefers(Leiden University Medical Center), Vincent T.H.B.M. Smit(Leiden University Medical Center), Hein Putter(Leiden University Medical Center), Joan B. Heijns(Amphia Ziekenhuis), Laurens van Warmerdam(Radboud University Nijmegen), Lonneke W. Kessels(Deventer Ziekenhuis), Wouter Dercksen(Radboud University Nijmegen), Manon J. Pepels(Elkerliek Ziekenhuis), E. Maartense(Reinier de Graaf Hospital), Hanneke W.M. van Laarhoven(Radboud University Nijmegen), Birgit E. P. J. Vriens(Maastricht University Medical Centre), Martin N.J.M. Wasser(Leiden University Medical Center), Neveen A. T. Hamdy(Leiden University Medical Center), Elma Meershoek – Klein Kranenbarg(Leiden University Medical Center), Elise van Leeuwen-Stok, Cornelis J.�H. van de Velde(Leiden University Medical Center), Judith R. Kroep(Leiden University Medical Center), J.W.R. Nortier(Leiden University Medical Center)
Journal of Clinical Oncology
May 20, 2013
Cited by 7

Abstract

1028 Background: The role of bisphosphonates when added to the neoadjuvant treatment of BC in enhancing the efficacy of therapy is still unknown. Methods: NEOZOTAC is a national, multicenter, randomized study comparing the efficacy of TAC (docetaxel, Adriamycin and cyclophosphamide i.v.) CT followed by G-CSF on day 2 with or without ZA 4 mg i.v. ,q 3 weeks in patients (pts) with stage II/III, measurable, HER2-negative BC and absence of prior bisphosphonate usage. The primary endpoint is the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate in the resection specimen and positive lymph nodes. 228 pts are needed to show an improvement of the pCR rates from 17% to 34% in the experimental arm using a 5% significance level based on the two-sided Fisher’s exact test with a power of 80%. Randomization was done by using the Pocock’s minimisation technique stratified by cT, cN and estrogen receptor status. pCR rate was analyzed using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test, adjusting for the stratification factors. Analysis was based on intent-to-treat. An unplanned subgroup analysis of postmenopausal women (PMW; FSH >20 and estradiol <110) and baseline vitamin D levels was performed. Results: From July 2010 to April 2012, 250 patients from 25 participating sites were randomized. Pathologic response data of 228 patients are currently available. pCR rate did not differ between the two study arms (17% vs 16%, p = 0.81). However, a trend in benefit in favor of ZA was observed in PMW (18% vs 11%, OR 1.90, 95% C.I. 0.52 – 6.88). Patients with severe vitamin D insufficiency (<25 nmol/L) seemed to respond worse to CT numerically (6% vs. 18%). At ASCO pCR and clinical response data of all patients will be reported. Conclusions: Previously, we have shown that adding ZA to neoadjuvant CT is safe with good compliance.In this study, treatment with ZA did not result in a pCR benefit in the total study population. However our findings suggest that addition of ZA to neoadjuvant CT might be effective for enhancing response in PMW with BC. Clinical trial information: NCT01099436.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis