Use of the Instantaneous Wave-free Ratio or Fractional Flow Reserve in PCI

Justin E. Davies(Hammersmith Hospital), Sayan Sen(Hammersmith Hospital), Hakim‐Moulay Dehbi(Cancer Research UK), Rasha Al‐Lamee(Hammersmith Hospital), Ricardo Petraco(Hammersmith Hospital), Sukhjinder Nijjer(Hammersmith Hospital), Ravinay Bhindi(Royal North Shore Hospital), Sam J. Lehman(Flinders University), D. Walters(Hammersmith Hospital), James Sapontis(Hammersmith Hospital), Luc Janssens(Hammersmith Hospital), Christiaan Vrints(Hammersmith Hospital), Ahmed Khashaba(Ain Shams University), Mika Laine(Helsinki University Hospital), Éric Van Belle(Inserm), Florian Krackhardt(Hammersmith Hospital), Waldemar Bojara(Hammersmith Hospital), Olaf Göing(Hammersmith Hospital), Tobias Härle(Hammersmith Hospital), Ciro Indolfi(Hammersmith Hospital), Giampaolo Niccoli(Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore), Flavo Ribichini(University of Verona), Nobuhiro Tanaka(Tokyo Medical University), Hiroyoshi Yokoi(Hammersmith Hospital), Hiroaki Takashima(Hammersmith Hospital), Yuetsu Kikuta(Hammersmith Hospital), Andrejs Ērglis(Hammersmith Hospital), Hugo Vinhas(Hammersmith Hospital), Pedro Canas da Silva(Hammersmith Hospital), Sérgio Bravo Baptista(Hammersmith Hospital), Ali Alghamdi(Hammersmith Hospital), Farrel Hellig(Hammersmith Hospital), Bon–Kwon Koo(Hammersmith Hospital), Chang‐Wook Nam(Hammersmith Hospital), Eun‐Seok Shin(Ulsan College), Joon‐Hyung Doh(Hammersmith Hospital), Salvatore Brugaletta(Hammersmith Hospital), Eduardo Alegría‐Barrero(Universidad Francisco de Vitoria), Martijin Meuwissen(Hammersmith Hospital), Jan J. Piek(Hammersmith Hospital), Niels van Royen(Hammersmith Hospital), Murat Sezer(Hammersmith Hospital), Carlo Di Mario(Hammersmith Hospital), Robert Gerber(Hammersmith Hospital), Iqbal Malik(Hammersmith Hospital), Andrew Sharp(University of Exeter), Suneel Talwar(Royal Bournemouth Hospital), Kare Tang(Hammersmith Hospital), Habib Samady(Emory University), John D. Altman(Hammersmith Hospital), Arnold H. Seto(Hammersmith Hospital), Jasvindar Singh(Washington University in St. Louis), Allen Jeremias(Stony Brook University Hospital), Hitoshi Matsuo(Hammersmith Hospital), Rajesh Kharbanda(Hammersmith Hospital), Manesh R. Patel(Duke University), Patrick W. Serruys(Hammersmith Hospital), Javier Escaned(Universidad Complutense de Madrid)
New England Journal of Medicine
March 18, 2017
Cited by 951Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Coronary revascularization guided by fractional flow reserve (FFR) is associated with better patient outcomes after the procedure than revascularization guided by angiography alone. It is unknown whether the instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR), an alternative measure that does not require the administration of adenosine, will offer benefits similar to those of FFR. METHODS: We randomly assigned 2492 patients with coronary artery disease, in a 1:1 ratio, to undergo either iFR-guided or FFR-guided coronary revascularization. The primary end point was the 1-year risk of major adverse cardiac events, which were a composite of death from any cause, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or unplanned revascularization. The trial was designed to show the noninferiority of iFR to FFR, with a margin of 3.4 percentage points for the difference in risk. RESULTS: At 1 year, the primary end point had occurred in 78 of 1148 patients (6.8%) in the iFR group and in 83 of 1182 patients (7.0%) in the FFR group (difference in risk, -0.2 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.3 to 1.8; P<0.001 for noninferiority; hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.68 to 1.33; P=0.78). The risk of each component of the primary end point and of death from cardiovascular or noncardiovascular causes did not differ significantly between the groups. The number of patients who had adverse procedural symptoms and clinical signs was significantly lower in the iFR group than in the FFR group (39 patients [3.1%] vs. 385 patients [30.8%], P<0.001), and the median procedural time was significantly shorter (40.5 minutes vs. 45.0 minutes, P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Coronary revascularization guided by iFR was noninferior to revascularization guided by FFR with respect to the risk of major adverse cardiac events at 1 year. The rate of adverse procedural signs and symptoms was lower and the procedural time was shorter with iFR than with FFR. (Funded by Philips Volcano; DEFINE-FLAIR ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02053038 .).


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis