Dual Somatostatin Receptor/FDG PET/CT Imaging in Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumours: Proposal for a Novel Grading Scheme with Prognostic Significance

David LH Chan(University of Sydney), Nick Pavlakis(Royal North Shore Hospital), Geoffrey Schembri(Royal North Shore Hospital), Elizabeth J. Bernard(University of Sydney), Edward Hsiao(University of Sydney), Aimee R. Hayes(Royal North Shore Hospital), T. Barnes(Royal North Shore Hospital), Connie I. Diakos(Royal North Shore Hospital), Mustafa Khasraw(Royal North Shore Hospital), Jaswinder S. Samra(Royal North Shore Hospital), Enid M. Eslick(Royal North Shore Hospital), Paul Roach(University of Sydney), Alexander Engel(University of Sydney), Stephen Clarke(Royal North Shore Hospital), Dale L. Bailey(University of Sydney)
Theranostics
January 1, 2017
Cited by 283Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Background: PET scans using FDG and somatostatin receptor imaging agents have both been used to study neuroendocrine tumours. Most reports have documented the sensitivity and specificity of each radiopharmaceutical independently, and even suggested the superiority of one over the other for different grades of disease. Aim: The aim of this work was to develop a grading scheme that describes the joint results of both the FDG and somatostatin receptor imaging PET scans in staging subjects with neuroendocrine tumours in a single combined parameter. The grading scheme that has been developed is referred to as the NETPET grade. Methods: This is a retrospective study which assessed subjects who had both FDG and somatostatin receptor PET imaging at our institution within 31 days of each other. The NETPET grade was assigned by experienced nuclear medicine physicians and compared with other clinical data such as WHO grade and overall survival. Results: In the period 2011-2015 we were able to recruit 62 subjects with histologically proven metastatic neuroendocrine tumour for review. The NETPET grade incorporating both the FDG and somatostatin receptor imaging results was significantly correlated with overall survival by univariate analysis (p=0.0018), whereas in this cohort the WHO grade at the time of diagnosis did not correlate with survival.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis