Osimertinib or Platinum–Pemetrexed in <i>EGFR</i> T790M–Positive Lung Cancer

Tony Mok(Chinese University of Hong Kong), Yi‐Long Wu(Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center), Myung‐Ju Ahn(Sun Yat-sen University), Marina Chiara Garassino(Army Medical University), Hye Ryun Kim(Army Medical University), Suresh S. Ramalingam(Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center), Frances A. Shepherd(Chinese University of Hong Kong), Yong He(Chinese University of Hong Kong), Hiroaki Akamatsu(Army Medical University), Willemijn S.M.E. Theelen(Chinese University of Hong Kong), Chee Khoon Lee(Sun Yat-sen University), Martin Sebastian(Army Medical University), Alison Templeton(AstraZeneca (United Kingdom)), Helen Mann(Sun Yat-sen University), Marcelo Marotti(Sun Yat-sen University), Serban Ghiorghiu(Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center), Vassiliki A. Papadimitrakopoulou(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center)
New England Journal of Medicine
December 6, 2016
Cited by 3,315Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Osimertinib is an epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) that is selective for both EGFR-TKI sensitizing and T790M resistance mutations in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. The efficacy of osimertinib as compared with platinum-based therapy plus pemetrexed in such patients is unknown. METHODS: In this randomized, international, open-label, phase 3 trial, we assigned 419 patients with T790M-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, who had disease progression after first-line EGFR-TKI therapy, in a 2:1 ratio to receive either oral osimertinib (at a dose of 80 mg once daily) or intravenous pemetrexed (500 mg per square meter of body-surface area) plus either carboplatin (target area under the curve, 5 [AUC5]) or cisplatin (75 mg per square meter) every 3 weeks for up to six cycles; maintenance pemetrexed was allowed. In all the patients, disease had progressed during receipt of first-line EGFR-TKI therapy. The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival. RESULTS: The median duration of progression-free survival was significantly longer with osimertinib than with platinum therapy plus pemetrexed (10.1 months vs. 4.4 months; hazard ratio; 0.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.23 to 0.41; P<0.001). The objective response rate was significantly better with osimertinib (71%; 95% CI, 65 to 76) than with platinum therapy plus pemetrexed (31%; 95% CI, 24 to 40) (odds ratio for objective response, 5.39; 95% CI, 3.47 to 8.48; P<0.001). Among 144 patients with metastases to the central nervous system (CNS), the median duration of progression-free survival was longer among patients receiving osimertinib than among those receiving platinum therapy plus pemetrexed (8.5 months vs. 4.2 months; hazard ratio, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.21 to 0.49). The proportion of patients with adverse events of grade 3 or higher was lower with osimertinib (23%) than with platinum therapy plus pemetrexed (47%). CONCLUSIONS: Osimertinib had significantly greater efficacy than platinum therapy plus pemetrexed in patients with T790M-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (including those with CNS metastases) in whom disease had progressed during first-line EGFR-TKI therapy. (Funded by AstraZeneca; AURA3 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02151981 .).


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis