Direct oral anticoagulant considerations in solid organ transplantation: A review

David M. Salerno(NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital), Demetra Tsapepas(NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital), Apostolos Papachristos(Hygeia Hospital), Jae‐Hyung Chang(Columbia University Irving Medical Center), Spencer T. Martin(Hartford Hospital), Mark A. Hardy(Columbia University Irving Medical Center), Jaclyn T. McKeen(Hackensack University Medical Center)
Clinical Transplantation
November 16, 2016
Cited by 53Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

For more than 60 years, warfarin was the only oral anticoagulation agent available for use in the United States. In many recent clinical trials, several direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) demonstrated similar efficacy with an equal or superior safety profile, with some other notable benefits. The DOACs have lower inter- and intrapatient variability, much shorter half-lives, and less known drug-drug and drug-food interactions as compared to warfarin. Despite these demonstrated benefits, the use of DOACs has not gained uniform acceptance because of lack of supportive data in special patient populations, including recipients of solid organ transplants maintained on immunosuppression. This review describes the properties of several novel DOACs including their pharmacology and mechanisms of action as they relate to use among solid organ transplant recipients. We have particularly focused on (i) dosing in patients with impaired renal and hepatic function; (ii) considerations for drug-drug interactions with immunosuppressive medications; and (iii) management of the anticoagulated patients at the time of unplanned surgery. The risks and benefits of the use of DOACs in solid organ transplant recipients should be carefully evaluated prior to the introduction of these agents in this highly distinct patient population.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis