A phase I study of SAR566658, an anti CA6-antibody drug conjugate (ADC), in patients (Pts) with CA6-positive advanced solid tumors (STs)(NCT01156870).

Carlos Gomez‐Roca(Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse), Valentina Boni, Víctor Moreno, John C. Morris(University of Cincinnati), Jean‐Pierre Delord(Institut Claudius Regaud), Emiliano Calvo, Kyriakos P. Papadopoulos(South Texas Accelerated Research Therapeutics), Olivier Rixe(UNM Comprehensive Cancer Center), Patrick Cohen(Sanofi (France)), Alexia Tellier(Sanofi (France)), Samira Ziti‐Ljajic(Sanofi (France)), Anthony W. Tolcher(South Texas Accelerated Research Therapeutics)
Journal of Clinical Oncology
May 20, 2016
Cited by 38

Abstract

2511 Background: SAR566658 (SAR) is a maytansinoid-loaded ADC targeting CA6, a sialoglycotope of MUC-1 over-expressed in solid tumors and rarely in normal tissues. Methods: Phase I dose escalation and expansion study to evaluate SAR intravenous administration as single agent every 3 weeks (q3w) and 2 weeks (q2w). Primary objective included dose limiting toxicities (DLTs), maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose (RD). Secondary objectives were PK, PD and preliminary efficacy assessment (RECIST1.1). Results: One hundred and fourteen patients (Pts) with heavily pretreated solid tumors expressing CA6 in ≥ 30% tumor cells with an intensity 2/3+ by immunohistochemistry were enrolled. SAR was administered across 11 dose levels (DLs) (10 to 240 mg/m² q3w and 120 mg/m² q2w). DLTs [1 grade (Gr) 3 diarrhea and 2 Gr3 keratitis] were observed at 240 mg/m². Initial RD was 190 mg/m² however a high incidence of keratopathy was seen mainly at cycle 2. PK/safety simulation, preserving drug exposure and limiting keratopathy incidence, proposed two alternative schedules: 90 mg/m² D1,D8 q3w and 120 mg/m² q2w. Most common adverse event (AE) was reversible Gr2/3 keratopathy in 41/114 (36%) (Gr3 in 9 Pts). Among these 41 Pts, 15/23 (65%) received 190 mg/m², 12/33 (36%) 150 mg/m², 6/8 (75%) 240 mg/m², 6/17 (35%) 90 mg/m² D1,D8 and 2/16 (13%) 120 mg/m² q2w. Prophylaxis with vasoconstrictor and steroids eye drops implemented in 8 patients in alternative schedules prevented keratopathy. Other AEs were fatigue (32.6%), peripheral neuropathy (31.6%), GI disorders [(nausea (29%), abdominal pain (26%), diarrhea (25%)] and neutropenia (2.6%). Low grade liver and renal abnormalities were noted.Tumor regression was noted in about 60% Pts at 190 and 90 mg/m² D1,D8 and 35% Pts at 150 and 120 mg/m² q2w. One complete response (ovary), 8 partial responses (3 breast, 2 ovary, 1 NSCLC, 1 cervix and 1 bladder) and 39% stable disease were noted. Highest overall response rate (ORR) was observed in 2/15 at 90 mg/m² D1,D8 and 3/23 at 190 mg/m². Conclusions: SAR 90 mg/m² D1,D8 q3w provided a favorable safety profile and encouraging antitumor activity and is selected as the RD for further clinical development. Clinical trial information: NCT01156870.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis