Niraparib Maintenance Therapy in Platinum-Sensitive, Recurrent Ovarian Cancer

Mansoor R. Mirza(Copenhagen University Hospital), Bradley J. Monk(Creighton University), Jørn Herrstedt(Odense University Hospital), Amit M. Oza(University Health Network), Sven Mahner(Nordic Society of Gynecologic Oncology), Andrés Redondo(Hospital Universitario La Paz), Michel Fabbro(Nordic Society of Gynecologic Oncology), Jonathan A. Ledermann(Cancer Institute (WIA)), Domenica Lorusso(Gynecologic Oncology Group), Ignace Vergote(Nordic Society of Gynecologic Oncology), Noa Ben-Baruch(Kaplan Medical Center), Christian Marth(Nordic Society of Gynecologic Oncology), Radosław Mądry(Nordic Society of Gynecologic Oncology), René dePont Christensen(University of Southern Denmark), Jonathan S. Berek(Cancer Institute (WIA)), Anne Dørum(Oslo University Hospital), Anna V. Tinker(BC Cancer Agency), Andreas du Bois(Nordic Society of Gynecologic Oncology), Antonio González-Martı́n(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Philippe Follana(Nordic Society of Gynecologic Oncology), Benedict B. Benigno(Northside Hospital), Per Rosenberg(Nordic Society of Gynecologic Oncology), Lucy Gilbert(McGill University Health Centre), B.J. Rimel(Cedars-Sinai Medical Center), Joseph Buscema(Nordic Society of Gynecologic Oncology), John Balser(Nordic Society of Gynecologic Oncology), Shefali Agarwal(Nordic Society of Gynecologic Oncology), Ursula A. Matulonis(Nordic Society of Gynecologic Oncology)
New England Journal of Medicine
October 8, 2016
Cited by 2,448Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Niraparib is an oral poly(adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose) polymerase (PARP) 1/2 inhibitor that has shown clinical activity in patients with ovarian cancer. We sought to evaluate the efficacy of niraparib versus placebo as maintenance treatment for patients with platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial, patients were categorized according to the presence or absence of a germline BRCA mutation (gBRCA cohort and non-gBRCA cohort) and the type of non-gBRCA mutation and were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive niraparib (300 mg) or placebo once daily. The primary end point was progression-free survival. RESULTS: Of 553 enrolled patients, 203 were in the gBRCA cohort (with 138 assigned to niraparib and 65 to placebo), and 350 patients were in the non-gBRCA cohort (with 234 assigned to niraparib and 116 to placebo). Patients in the niraparib group had a significantly longer median duration of progression-free survival than did those in the placebo group, including 21.0 vs. 5.5 months in the gBRCA cohort (hazard ratio, 0.27; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.17 to 0.41), as compared with 12.9 months vs. 3.8 months in the non-gBRCA cohort for patients who had tumors with homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) (hazard ratio, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.24 to 0.59) and 9.3 months vs. 3.9 months in the overall non-gBRCA cohort (hazard ratio, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.61; P<0.001 for all three comparisons). The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events that were reported in the niraparib group were thrombocytopenia (in 33.8%), anemia (in 25.3%), and neutropenia (in 19.6%), which were managed with dose modifications. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer, the median duration of progression-free survival was significantly longer among those receiving niraparib than among those receiving placebo, regardless of the presence or absence of gBRCA mutations or HRD status, with moderate bone marrow toxicity. (Funded by Tesaro; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01847274 .).


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis