ELM behavior in ASDEX Upgrade with and without nitrogen seeding
L. Frassinetti(European Incoherent Scatter Scientific Association), E. Viezzer(Universidad de Sevilla), E. Wolfrum(Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics), H. Meyer(Culham Centre for Fusion Energy), D. Carralero, R. M. McDermott(Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics), R. Fischer(Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics), F. M. Laggner(TU Wien), M. Cavedon(Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics), M. Beurskens(Japan Atomic Energy Agency), M. Dunne(Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics), A. V. Bogomolov(Lomonosov Moscow State University), G. Tardini(Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics)
Cited by 13
Related Papers
Active Control of Type-I Edge-Localized Modes with<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:math>Perturbation Fields in the JET Tokamak
|Physical Review Letters|2007|595
A first-principles predictive model of the pedestal height and width: development, testing and ITER optimization with the EPED model
|Nuclear Fusion|2011|452
JET ITER-like wall—overview and experimental programme
|Physica Scripta|2011|346
I-mode: an H-mode energy confinement regime with L-mode particle transport in Alcator C-Mod
|Nuclear Fusion|2010|340
Pedestal stability comparison and ITER pedestal prediction
|Nuclear Fusion|2009|231