The efficacy of anti‐PD‐1 agents in acral and mucosal melanoma

Alexander N. Shoushtari(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Rodrigo Ramella Munhoz(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Deborah Kuk(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Patrick A. Ott(Harvard University), Douglas B. Johnson(Vanderbilt University), Katy K. Tsai(University of California, San Francisco), Suthee Rapisuwon(Georgetown University), Zeynep Eroglu(Moffitt Cancer Center), Ryan J. Sullivan(Harvard University), Jason J. Luke(University of Chicago), Tara C. Gangadhar(University of Pennsylvania), April K.S. Salama(Duke University), Varina R. Clark(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Clare Burias(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Igor Puzanov(Vanderbilt University), Michael B. Atkins(Georgetown University), Alain P. Algazi(University of California, San Francisco), Antoni Ribas(University of California, Los Angeles), Jedd D. Wolchok(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Michael A. Postow(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center)
Cancer
August 17, 2016
Cited by 302

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic antibodies against programmed cell death receptor 1 (PD-1) are considered front-line therapy in metastatic melanoma. The efficacy of PD-1 blockade for patients with biologically distinct melanomas arising from acral and mucosal surfaces has not been well described. METHODS: A multi-institutional, retrospective cohort analysis identified adults with advanced acral and mucosal melanoma who received treatment with nivolumab or pembrolizumab as standard clinical practice through expanded access programs or published prospective trials. Objective responses were determined using investigator-assessed Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. Progression-free survival and overall survival were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Sixty individuals were identified, including 25 (42%) with acral melanoma and 35 (58%) with mucosal melanoma. Fifty-one patients (85%) had received previous therapy, including 77% who had previously received ipilimumab. Forty patients (67%) received pembrolizumab at a dose of 2 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg, and 20 (33%) received nivolumab at a doses ranging from 0.3 to 10 mg/kg every 2 to 3 weeks. The objective response rate was 32% (95% confidence interval, 15%-54%) in patients with acral melanoma and 23% (95% confidence interval, 10%-40%) in those with mucosal melanoma. After a median follow-up of 20 months in the acral melanoma group and 10.6 months in the mucosal melanoma group, the median progression-free survival was 4.1 months and 3.9 months, respectively. Only 2 patients (3%) discontinued treatment because of toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Response rates to PD-1 blockade in patients with acral and mucosal melanomas were comparable to the published rates in patients with cutaneous melanoma and support the routine use of PD-1 blockade in clinical practice. Further investigation is needed to identify the mechanisms of response and resistance to therapy in these subtypes. Cancer 2016;122:3354-3362. © 2016 American Cancer Society.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis