Nivolumab ± ipilimumab in treatment (tx) of patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with and without high microsatellite instability (MSI-H): CheckMate-142 interim results.

Michael J. Overman(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Scott Kopetz(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Raymond S. McDermott(St. Vincent's University Hospital), Joseph L. Leach(Allina Health), Sara Lonardi(Istituto Oncologico Veneto), Heinz‐Josef Lenz(University of Southern California), Michael A. Morse(Duke University), Jayesh Desai(The Royal Melbourne Hospital), Andrew Hill(Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group), Michael D. Axelson(Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States)), Rebecca A. Moss(Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States)), Chensheng Lin(Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States)), Monica V. Goldberg(Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States)), Thierry André(Sorbonne Université)
Journal of Clinical Oncology
May 20, 2016
Cited by 139

Abstract

3501 Background: Evidence supports use of nivolumab (N) in MSI-H mCRC. N, a fully human anti-PD-1 mAb and ipilimumab (I), a humanized anti-CTLA-4 mAb, have favorable safety & efficacy in other tumors. CheckMate-142, a phase 2 study, evaluates N ± I in pts with mCRC, MSI-H and non-MSI-H. Methods: Pts had ECOG PS 0–1, and intolerance/progression on ≥ 1 tx. MSI-H pts received N 3 mg/kg q2 wk (N3) or N 3 mg/kg + I 1 mg/kg q3 wk (N3+I1) x 4 doses followed by N3 until disease progression (PD) or other discontinuation. Initial evaluation of N+I at 3 doses was completed in non-MSI-H pts. Primary endpoint was investigator-reported ORR by RECIST 1.1; other endpoints were safety, OS, and PFS. Results: 33 (N3) and 26 (N3+I1) MSI-H pts, and 3 (N1+I1), 10 (N1+I3), and 10 (N3+I1) non-MSI-H pts were enrolled. 82% (N3) and 92% (N3+I1) of MSI-H and 100% of non-MSI-H pts had ≥ 2 prior regimens. 15% (N3) and 25% (N3+I1) of MSI-H pts had known BRAF V600E. 17 (52%; N3) and 19 (73%; N3+I1) MSI-H pts remain on tx. Efficacy results are shown in the Table. In MSI-H pts, tx-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 26 (79%; N3) and 22 pts (85%; N3+I1); most common were diarrhea and fatigue (27% each; N3) and diarrhea (46%; N3+I1). Grade 3–4 TRAEs occurred in 7 (N3) and 8 pts (N3+I1). One pt on N3 had a Grade 5 TRAE (sudden death). In non-MSI-H pts median (95% CI) PFS was 1.4 mo (1.2–1.9; pooled N+I). Conclusions: N and N+I were well tolerated in most pts and demonstrated encouraging clinical activity and survival in MSI-H mCRC. This study is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT02060188.MSI-Ha efficacy. N3 (n = 33) N3+I1 (n = 26) ORR, n (%) 9 (27) 4 (15) CR 0 0 Confirmed PR 9 (27) 4 (15) SD 8 (24) 17 (65) PD 11 (33) 3 (12) Not determined/not reported 5 (15) 2 (8) Median duration of response (95% CI), mo NR (4.2–NE) NR (NE–NE) Median PFS (95% CI), mo 5.3 (1.4–NE) NR (NE–NE) 4-mo PFS rate,b % 55 80 Median OS (95% CI), mo 16.3 (8.3–NE) NR (NE–NE) 5-mo OS rate,c % 75 100 NR, not reached; NE, not estimable aBy local screen bPFS Kaplan-Meier plot estimate, N3 = 17/33 events, N3+I1 = 4/26 events cPFS Kaplan-Meier plot estimate, N3 = 11/33 events, N3+I1 = 0/26 events


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis