Adaptive Randomization of Neratinib in Early Breast Cancer

John W. Park(University of California, San Francisco), Minetta C. Liu(University of California System), Douglas Yee(University of Minnesota System), Christina Yau(University of California System), Laura van ‘t Veer(University of California, San Francisco), W. Fraser Symmans(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Melissa Paoloni(University of California System), Jane Perlmutter(Gemini Computers (United States)), Nola M. Hylton(University of California System), Michael Hogarth(University of California, Davis), Angela DeMichele(University of Pennsylvania), Meredith Buxton(University of California System), A. Jo Chien(University of California System), Anne M. Wallace(University of California, San Diego), Judy C. Boughey(Mayo Clinic), Tufia C. Haddad(University of Minnesota System), Jane Yuet Ching Hui(Oregon Health & Science University), Kathleen Kemmer(University of California System), Henry G. Kaplan(University of California System), Claudine Isaacs(Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center), Rita Nanda(University of California System), Debasish Tripathy(University of Southern California), Kathy S. Albain(University of California System), Kirsten K. Edmiston(Inova Fairfax Hospital), Anthony Elias(University of Denver), Donald W. Northfelt(University of California System), Lajos Pusztai(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Stacy L. Moulder(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Julie E. Lang(University of California System), Rebecca K. Viscusi(University of Arizona), David Euhus(University of California System), Barbara Haley(The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center), Qamar J. Khan(University of Kansas), William C. Wood(Emory University), Michelle Melisko(University of California, San Francisco), Richard B. Schwab(University of California System), Teresa Helsten(University of California, San Diego), Julia Lyandres(University of California System), Sarah Davis(University of California, San Francisco), Gillian L. Hirst(University of California, San Francisco), Ashish Sanil(Berry & Associates (United States)), Laura J. Esserman(University of California, San Francisco), Donald A. Berry(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center)
New England Journal of Medicine
July 6, 2016
Cited by 458Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The heterogeneity of breast cancer makes identifying effective therapies challenging. The I-SPY 2 trial, a multicenter, adaptive phase 2 trial of neoadjuvant therapy for high-risk clinical stage II or III breast cancer, evaluated multiple new agents added to standard chemotherapy to assess the effects on rates of pathological complete response (i.e., absence of residual cancer in the breast or lymph nodes at the time of surgery). METHODS: We used adaptive randomization to compare standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus the tyrosine kinase inhibitor neratinib with control. Eligible women were categorized according to eight biomarker subtypes on the basis of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status, hormone-receptor status, and risk according to a 70-gene profile. Neratinib was evaluated against control with regard to 10 biomarker signatures (prospectively defined combinations of subtypes). The primary end point was pathological complete response. Volume changes on serial magnetic resonance imaging were used to assess the likelihood of such a response in each patient. Adaptive assignment to experimental groups within each disease subtype was based on Bayesian probabilities of the superiority of the treatment over control. Enrollment in the experimental group was stopped when the 85% Bayesian predictive probability of success in a confirmatory phase 3 trial of neoadjuvant therapy reached a prespecified threshold for any biomarker signature ("graduation"). Enrollment was stopped for futility if the probability fell to below 10% for every biomarker signature. RESULTS: Neratinib reached the prespecified efficacy threshold with regard to the HER2-positive, hormone-receptor-negative signature. Among patients with HER2-positive, hormone-receptor-negative cancer, the mean estimated rate of pathological complete response was 56% (95% Bayesian probability interval [PI], 37 to 73%) among 115 patients in the neratinib group, as compared with 33% among 78 controls (95% PI, 11 to 54%). The final predictive probability of success in phase 3 testing was 79%. CONCLUSIONS: Neratinib added to standard therapy was highly likely to result in higher rates of pathological complete response than standard chemotherapy with trastuzumab among patients with HER2-positive, hormone-receptor-negative breast cancer. (Funded by QuantumLeap Healthcare Collaborative and others; I-SPY 2 TRIAL ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01042379.).


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis