MWA Versus RFA for Perivascular and Peribiliary CRLM: A Retrospective Patient- and Lesion-Based Analysis of Two Historical Cohorts
Aukje A. J. M. van Tilborg(Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam), Martijn R. Meijerink(Dutch Cancer Society), Cornelis van Kuijk(Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc), Laurien G. P. H. Vroomen(Amsterdam University Medical Centers), Karin Nielsen(Amsterdam University Medical Centers), Marcus C. de Jong(Amsterdam University Medical Centers), Petrousjka M. P. van den Tol(Amsterdam University Medical Centers), Hester J. Scheffer(Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)
Cited by 91
Related Papers
Comparison of Coronary CT Angiography, SPECT, PET, and Hybrid Imaging for Diagnosis of Ischemic Heart Disease Determined by Fractional Flow Reserve
|JAMA Cardiology|2017|463
Irreversible Electroporation for Nonthermal Tumor Ablation in the Clinical Setting: A Systematic Review of Safety and Efficacy
|Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology|2014|401
High-Voltage Electrical Pulses in Oncology: Irreversible Electroporation, Electrochemotherapy, Gene Electrotransfer, Electrofusion, and Electroimmunotherapy
|Radiology|2020|363
Colorectal liver metastases: surgery versus thermal ablation (COLLISION) – a phase III single-blind prospective randomized controlled trial
|BMC Cancer|2018|236
Radiofrequency and Microwave Ablation Compared to Systemic Chemotherapy and to Partial Hepatectomy in the Treatment of Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
|CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology|2018|201