Reduced-Intensity Transplantation for Lymphomas Using Haploidentical Related Donors Versus HLA-Matched Sibling Donors: A Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research Analysis

Nilanjan Ghosh(Smith Institute), Reem Karmali(Smith Institute), Vanderson Rocha(Smith Institute), Kwang Woo Ahn(Smith Institute), Alyssa DiGilio(Smith Institute), Parameswaran Hari(Smith Institute), Veronika Bachanová(Smith Institute), Ulrike Bacher(Smith Institute), Parastoo B. Dahi(Smith Institute), Marcos de Lima(Smith Institute), Anita D’Souza(Smith Institute), Timothy S. Fenske(Smith Institute), Siddhartha Ganguly(Smith Institute), Mohamed A. Kharfan‐Dabaja(Smith Institute), Tim Prestidge(Smith Institute), Bipin N. Savani(Smith Institute), Sonali M. Smith(Smith Institute), Anna M. Sureda(Smith Institute), Edmund K. Waller(Smith Institute), Samantha Jaglowski(Smith Institute), Alex F. Herrera(Smith Institute), Philippe Armand(Smith Institute), Rachel B. Salit(Smith Institute), Nina D. Wagner‐Johnston(Smith Institute), Ephraim J. Fuchs(Smith Institute), Javier Bolaños‐Meade(Smith Institute), Mehdi Hamadani(Smith Institute)
Journal of Clinical Oncology
June 7, 2016
Cited by 227

Abstract

PURPOSE: Related donor haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (Haplo-HCT) using post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) is increasingly used in patients lacking HLA-matched sibling donors (MSD). We compared outcomes after Haplo-HCT using PT-Cy with MSD-HCT in patients with lymphoma, using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research registry. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated 987 adult patients undergoing either Haplo-HCT (n = 180) or MSD-HCT (n = 807) following reduced-intensity conditioning regimens. The haploidentical group received graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis with PT-Cy with or without a calcineurin inhibitor and mycophenolate. The MSD group received calcineurin inhibitor-based GVHD prophylaxis. RESULTS: Median follow-up of survivors was 3 years. The 28-day neutrophil recovery was similar in the two groups (95% v 97%; P = .31). The 28-day platelet recovery was delayed in the haploidentical group compared with the MSD group (63% v 91%; P = .001). Cumulative incidence of grade II to IV acute GVHD at day 100 was similar between the two groups (27% v 25%; P = .84). Cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD at 1 year was significantly lower after Haplo-HCT (12% v 45%; P < .001), and this benefit was confirmed on multivariate analysis (relative risk, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.14 to 0.31; P < .001). For Haplo-HCT v MSD-HCT, 3-year rates of nonrelapse mortality (15% v 13%; P = .41), relapse/progression (37% v 40%; P = .51), progression-free survival (48% v 48%; P = .96), and overall survival (61% v 62%; P = .82) were similar. Multivariate analysis showed no significant difference between Haplo-HCT and MSD-HCT in terms of nonrelapse mortality (P = .06), progression/relapse (P = .10), progression-free survival (P = .83), and overall survival (P = .34). CONCLUSION: Haplo-HCT with PT-Cy provides survival outcomes comparable to MSD-HCT, with a significantly lower risk of chronic GVHD.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis