Integration of genetic and clinical risk factors improves prognostication in relapsed childhood B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Julie Irving(Newcastle University), Amir Enshaei(Newcastle University), Catriona Parker(Manchester Academic Health Science Centre), Rosemary Sutton(UNSW Sydney), Roland P. Kuiper(Radboud University Nijmegen), Amy Erhorn(Newcastle University), Lynne Minto(Newcastle University), Nicola C. Venn(UNSW Sydney), Tamara Law(UNSW Sydney), Jiangyan Yu(Radboud University Nijmegen), Claire Schwab(Newcastle University), Rosanna Davies(Newcastle University), Elizabeth Matheson(Newcastle University), Alysia Davies(Newcastle University), Edwin Sonneveld(Stichting Kinderoncologie Nederland), Monique L. den Boer(Stichting Kinderoncologie Nederland), Sharon Love(University of Oxford), Christine J. Harrison(Newcastle University), Peter M. Hoogerbrugge(Stichting Kinderoncologie Nederland), Tamás Révész(South Australia Pathology), Vaskar Saha(Manchester Academic Health Science Centre), Anthony V. Moorman(Newcastle University)
Cited by 135Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Somatic genetic abnormalities are initiators and drivers of disease and have proven clinical utility at initial diagnosis. However, the genetic landscape and its clinical utility at relapse are less well understood and have not been studied comprehensively. We analyzed cytogenetic data from 427 children with relapsed B-cell precursor ALL treated on the international trial, ALLR3. Also we screened 238 patients with a marrow relapse for selected copy number alterations (CNAs) and mutations. Cytogenetic risk groups were predictive of outcome postrelapse and survival rates at 5 years for patients with good, intermediate-, and high-risk cytogenetics were 68%, 47%, and 26%, respectively (P < .001). TP53 alterations and NR3C1/BTG1 deletions were associated with a higher risk of progression: hazard ratio 2.36 (95% confidence interval, 1.51-3.70, P < .001) and 2.15 (1.32-3.48, P = .002). NRAS mutations were associated with an increased risk of progression among standard-risk patients with high hyperdiploidy: 3.17 (1.15-8.71, P = .026). Patients classified clinically as standard and high risk had distinct genetic profiles. The outcome of clinical standard-risk patients with high-risk cytogenetics was equivalent to clinical high-risk patients. Screening patients at relapse for key genetic abnormalities will enable the integration of genetic and clinical risk factors to improve patient stratification and outcome. This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.org as #ISCRTN45724312.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis