The APOSTEL recommendations for reporting quantitative optical coherence tomography studies

Andrés Cruz-Herranz(University College London), Lisanne J. Balk(Johns Hopkins University), Timm Oberwahrenbrock(University College London), Shiv Saidha(Moorfields Eye Hospital), Elena H. Martínez‐Lapiscina(New York University), Wolf A. Lagrèze(University of California, San Francisco), Joel S. Schuman(Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc), Pablo Villoslada(University of California, San Francisco), Peter A. Calabresi(Moorfields Eye Hospital), Laura J. Balcer(University of California, San Francisco), Axel Petzold(University of California, San Francisco), Ari Green(New York University), Friedemann Paul(University College London), Alexander U. Brandt(University Medical Center Freiburg), Philipp Albrecht(University College London), Jaime Imitola, Ahmed Toosy, Hanna Zimmermann, Olivier Outteryck, Rachel Nolan, Scott Kolbe, Jette Lautrup Frederiksen Battistini, Orhan Aktaş, Letizia Leocani, Ann Ming Yeh(Multiple Sclerosis Center of Atlanta), Joachim Havla, Marius Ringelstein, Gorm Pihl-Jensen, Jana Lízrová Preiningerová, Sven Schippling, Fiona Costello
Neurology
May 26, 2016
Cited by 407Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop consensus recommendations for reporting of quantitative optical coherence tomography (OCT) study results. METHODS: A panel of experienced OCT researchers (including 11 neurologists, 2 ophthalmologists, and 2 neuroscientists) discussed requirements for performing and reporting quantitative analyses of retinal morphology and developed a list of initial recommendations based on experience and previous studies. The list of recommendations was subsequently revised during several meetings of the coordinating group. RESULTS: We provide a 9-point checklist encompassing aspects deemed relevant when reporting quantitative OCT studies. The areas covered are study protocol, acquisition device, acquisition settings, scanning protocol, funduscopic imaging, postacquisition data selection, postacquisition data analysis, recommended nomenclature, and statistical analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The Advised Protocol for OCT Study Terminology and Elements recommendations include core items to standardize and improve quality of reporting in quantitative OCT studies. The recommendations will make reporting of quantitative OCT studies more consistent and in line with existing standards for reporting research in other biomedical areas. The recommendations originated from expert consensus and thus represent Class IV evidence. They will need to be regularly adjusted according to new insights and practices.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis