Do invitations for cervical screening provide sufficient information to enable informed choice? A cross-sectional study of invitations for publicly funded cervical screening

Sie Karen Kolthoff(University of Copenhagen), John Brodersen(University of Copenhagen), Karsten Juhl Jørgensen(University of Southern Denmark), Mie Sara Hestbech(University of Copenhagen)
Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
April 26, 2016
10.1177/0141076816643324
Cited by 23

Related Papers

The Danish Randomized Lung Cancer CT Screening Trial—Overall Design and Results of the Prevalence Round
|Journal of Thoracic Oncology|2009|440
CT screening for lung cancer brings forward early disease. The randomised Danish Lung Cancer Screening Trial: status after five annual screening rounds with low-dose CT
|Thorax|2012|391
Overdiagnosis: what it is and what it isn’t
|BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine|2018|368
Results of the Randomized Danish Lung Cancer Screening Trial with Focus on High-Risk Profiling
|American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine|2015|343
Long-Term Psychosocial Consequences of False-Positive Screening Mammography
|The Annals of Family Medicine|2013|342