Opportunities and challenges for TCR mimic antibodies in cancer therapy

Aaron Y. Chang(Cornell University), Ron S. Gejman(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Elliott J. Brea(Cornell University), Claire Y. Oh(Cornell University), Melissa Mathias(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Dmitry Pankov(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Emily Casey(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Tao Dao(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), David A. Scheinberg(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center)
Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy
April 20, 2016
Cited by 59

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are potent cancer therapeutic agents, but exclusively recognize cell-surface targets whereas most cancer-associated proteins are found intracellularly. Hence, potential cancer therapy targets such as over expressed self-proteins, activated oncogenes, mutated tumor suppressors, and translocated gene products are not accessible to traditional mAb therapy. An emerging approach to target these epitopes is the use of TCR mimic mAbs (TCRm) that recognize epitopes similar to those of T cell receptors (TCR). AREAS COVERED: TCRm antigens are composed of a linear peptide sequence derived from degraded proteins and presented in the context of cell-surface MHC molecules. We discuss how the nature of the TCRm epitopes provides both advantages (absolute tumor specificity and access to a new universe of important targets) and disadvantages (low density, MHC restriction, MHC down-regulation, and cross-reactive linear epitopes) to conventional mAb therapy. We will also discuss potential solutions to these obstacles. EXPERT OPINION: TCRm combine the specificity of TCR recognition with the potency, pharmacologic properties, and versatility of mAbs. The structure and presentation of a TCRm epitope has important consequences related to the choice of targets, mAb design, available peptides and MHC subtype restrictions, possible cross-reactivity, and therapeutic activity.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis