Exposure Matching for Extrapolation of Efficacy in Pediatric Drug Development

Yeruk Mulugeta(United States Food and Drug Administration), Jeffrey S. Barrett(Children's Hospital of Philadelphia), Robert M. Nelson(United States Food and Drug Administration), Abel Tilahun Eshete(United States Food and Drug Administration), Alvina Mushtaq(Children's National), Lynne Yao(United States Food and Drug Administration), Nicole Glasgow(University of Maryland, Baltimore), Andrew E. Mulberg(United States Food and Drug Administration), Daniel González(University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), Dionna Green(United States Food and Drug Administration), Jeffry Florian(United States Food and Drug Administration), Kevin Krudys(United States Food and Drug Administration), Shirley K. Seo(United States Food and Drug Administration), In‐Sook Kim(United States Food and Drug Administration), Dakshina Chilukuri(United States Food and Drug Administration), Gilbert J. Burckart(United States Food and Drug Administration)
The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
April 4, 2016
Cited by 77Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Abstract During drug development, matching adult systemic exposures of drugs is a common approach for dose selection in pediatric patients when efficacy is partially or fully extrapolated. This is a systematic review of approaches used for matching adult systemic exposures as the basis for dose selection in pediatric trials submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) between 1998 and 2012. The trial design of pediatric pharmacokinetic (PK) studies and the pediatric and adult systemic exposure data were obtained from FDA publicly available databases containing reviews of pediatric trials. Exposure‐matching approaches that were used as the basis for pediatric dose selection were reviewed. The PK data from the adult and pediatric populations were used to quantify exposure agreement between the 2 patient populations. The main measures were the pediatric PK studies’ trial design elements and drug systemic exposures (adult and pediatric). There were 31 products (86 trials) with full or partial extrapolation of efficacy with an available PK assessment. Pediatric exposures had a range of mean C max and AUC ratios (pediatric/adult) of 0.63 to 4.19 and 0.36 to 3.60, respectively. Seven of the 86 trials (8.1%) had a predefined acceptance boundary used to match adult exposures. The key PK parameter was consistently predefined for antiviral and anti‐infective products. Approaches to match exposure in children and adults varied across products. A consistent approach for systemic exposure matching and evaluating pediatric PK studies is needed to guide future pediatric trials.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis